2009PubMedRequires access

Capacity building is not an event but a process: lesson from health sector decentralization of Nepal.

Gagan Gurung

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Health Facility Operation and Management Committee are supposed to govern all the affairs of local health facilities under decentralization policy. The capacity building of the committee was deemed necessary and thus different stakeholders involved in the capacity building process. All agreed up on the need of capacity building of the committee but there were different school of thoughts on the contents and process of capacity building. Major capacity building inputs included orientations and training to the committee. However the follow up part was not uniform; some organizations conducted periodic reflection meeting, where as many ended up with the training. There were some tangible changes observed by the capacity building inputs. Their priority however was on infrastructure and drug purchase. The changes observed were very short lived and not sustainable. The capacity building was equated with training and an event with low priority on follow up, monitoring and coaching. It was not thought as a process. A concept of complete package of capacity building should have been developed where training component would be only an element of overall capacity building.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Health Facility Operation and Management Committee are supposed to govern all the affairs of local health facilities under decentralization policy. The capacity building of the committee was deemed necessary and thus different stakeholders involved in the capacity building process. All agreed up on the need of capacity building of the committee but there were different school of thoughts on the contents and process of capacity building. Major capacity building inputs included orientations and training to the committee. However the follow up part was not uniform; some organizations conducted periodic reflection meeting, where as many ended up with the training. There were some tangible changes observed by the capacity building inputs. Their priority however was on infrastructure and drug purchase. The changes observed were very short lived and not sustainable. The capacity building was equated with training and an event with low priority on follow up, monitoring and coaching. It was not thought as a process. A concept of complete package of capacity building should have been developed where training component would be only an element of overall capacity building.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Health Facility Operation and Management Committee are supposed to govern all the affairs of local health facilities under decentralization policy. The capacity building of the committee was deemed necessary and thus different stakeholders involved in the capacity building process. All agreed up on the need of capacity building of the committee but there were different school of thoughts on the contents and process of capacity building. Major capacity building inputs included orientations and training to the committee. However the follow up part was not uniform; some organizations conducted periodic reflection meeting, where as many ended up with the training. There were some tangible changes observed by the capacity building inputs. Their priority however was on infrastructure and drug purchase. The changes observed were very short lived and not sustainable. The capacity building was equated with training and an event with low priority on follow up, monitoring and coaching. It was not thought as a process. A concept of complete package of capacity building should have been developed where training component would be only an element of overall capacity building.

Key concepts: Capacity building, Decentralization, Coaching, Process (computing), Medicine, Event (particle physics), Reflection (computer programming), Process management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Capacity building is not an event but a process: lesson from health sector decentralization of Nepal. — Research Paper | ScholarLens