2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Original Paper Management of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding - from Theory to Practice

Sevastiţa Iordache, Adrian Săftoiu, Sergiu Marian Cazacu, Tudorel Ciurea

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) represents one of the most frequent medical and surgical emergencies. Upper GI endoscopy allows the treatment of the majority of lesions being associated with low transfusion requirement and decreasing of number of hospitalization days. Aim and method The aim of our study was to assess the clinical application of the elaborated guidelines for the management of upper GI bleeding in the Clinical County Emergency Hospital of Craiova. We assessed 100 consecutive patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding admitted through the Emergency Department. Results Upper GI endoscopy was performed in the first 24 hours in 50 % and as an elective procedure in 36 % of the patients. Therapeutic endoscopy was applied in 13.95% of the patients submitted for upper GI endoscopy Successful endoscopic haemostasis was performed in 85.7 % of cases, with re-bleeding and inefficient haemostasis in 14.3 %. Immediate surgery was necessary in 7 % of cases, 5 % of the patients were operated without previous upper GI endoscopy and 2 % after the failure of endoscopic haemostasis. Conclusion Although the algorithms of diagnosis and treatment were clearly designed, the assessment of the patients with non-variceal bleeding is incomplete and incorrect, in the absence of emergency endoscopy departments and dedicated intensive care compartments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) represents one of the most frequent medical and surgical emergencies. Upper GI endoscopy allows the treatment of the majority of lesions being associated with low transfusion requirement and decreasing of number of hospitalization days. Aim and method The aim of our study was to assess the clinical application of the elaborated guidelines for the management of upper GI bleeding in the Clinical County Emergency Hospital of Craiova. We assessed 100 consecutive patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding admitted through the Emergency Department. Results Upper GI endoscopy was performed in the first 24 hours in 50 % and as an elective procedure in 36 % of the patients. Therapeutic endoscopy was applied in 13.95% of the patients submitted for upper GI endoscopy Successful endoscopic haemostasis was performed in 85.7 % of cases, with re-bleeding and inefficient haemostasis in 14.3 %. Immediate surgery was necessary in 7 % of cases, 5 % of the patients were operated without previous upper GI endoscopy and 2 % after the failure of endoscopic haemostasis. Conclusion Although the algorithms of diagnosis and treatment were clearly designed, the assessment of the patients with non-variceal bleeding is incomplete and incorrect, in the absence of emergency endoscopy departments and dedicated intensive care compartments.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) represents one of the most frequent medical and surgical emergencies. Upper GI endoscopy allows the treatment of the majority of lesions being associated with low transfusion requirement and decreasing of number of hospitalization days. Aim and method The aim of our study was to assess the clinical application of the elaborated guidelines for the management of upper GI bleeding in the Clinical County Emergency Hospital of Craiova. We assessed 100 consecutive patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding admitted through the Emergency Department. Results Upper GI endoscopy was performed in the first 24 hours in 50 % and as an elective procedure in 36 % of the patients. Therapeutic endoscopy was applied in 13.95% of the patients submitted for upper GI endoscopy Successful endoscopic haemostasis was performed in 85.7 % of cases, with re-bleeding and inefficient haemostasis in 14.3 %. Immediate surgery was necessary in 7 % of cases, 5 % of the patients were operated without previous upper GI endoscopy and 2 % after the failure of endoscopic haemostasis. Conclusion Although the algorithms of diagnosis and treatment were clearly designed, the assessment of the patients with non-variceal bleeding is incomplete and incorrect, in the absence of emergency endoscopy departments and dedicated intensive care compartments.

Key concepts: Medicine, Endoscopy, Upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Upper endoscopy, Emergency department, Surgery, Therapeutic endoscopy, Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Original Paper Management of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding - from Theory to Practice — Research Paper | ScholarLens