2006•The Journal of Credit RiskRequires access

Basel requirements of downturn loss given default: modeling and estimating probability of default and loss given default correlations

Peter Miu, Bogie Ozdemir

Open publisher page 56 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Basel II requires that banks use downturn loss given default (LGD) estimates in regulatory capital calculations, citing the fact that the probability of default (PD) and LGD correlations are not captured. We show that the lack of correlation can be taken care of by incorporating a certain degree of conservatism in cyclical LGD in a point-in-time (PIT) framework. We examine a model that can capture the PD and LGD correlation in its entirety, differentiating the different components of correlations in question. Using historical LGD and default data of a loan portfolio, we calibrate our model and, through the simulation of economic capital, we show that the mean LGD needs to be increased by about 35% to 41% for a corporate portfolio and about 16% for a mid-market portfolio in order to compensate for the lack of correlations. Our hope is to provide a framework that the banks can use based on their internal data to estimate and justify their LGD choices for different portfolios. Although the paper is presented within the context of Basel II, the applications could be widened to include structured finance, credit derivatives, economic capital and portfolio modeling in general, where PD and LGD correlations need to be estimated and modeled.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT Basel II requires that banks use downturn loss given default (LGD) estimates in regulatory capital calculations, citing the fact that the probability of default (PD) and LGD correlations are not captured. We show that the lack of correlation can be taken care of by incorporating a certain degree of conservatism in cyclical LGD in a point-in-time (PIT) framework. We examine a model that can capture the PD and LGD correlation in its entirety, differentiating the different components of correlations in question. Using historical LGD and default data of a loan portfolio, we calibrate our model and, through the simulation of economic capital, we show that the mean LGD needs to be increased by about 35% to 41% for a corporate portfolio and about 16% for a mid-market portfolio in order to compensate for the lack of correlations. Our hope is to provide a framework that the banks can use based on their internal data to estimate and justify their LGD choices for different portfolios. Although the paper is presented within the context of Basel II, the applications could be widened to include structured finance, credit derivatives, economic capital and portfolio modeling in general, where PD and LGD correlations need to be estimated and modeled.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 56 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT Basel II requires that banks use downturn loss given default (LGD) estimates in regulatory capital calculations, citing the fact that the probability of default (PD) and LGD correlations are not captured. We show that the lack of correlation can be taken care of by incorporating a certain degree of conservatism in cyclical LGD in a point-in-time (PIT) framework. We examine a model that can capture the PD and LGD correlation in its entirety, differentiating the different components of correlations in question. Using historical LGD and default data of a loan portfolio, we calibrate our model and, through the simulation of economic capital, we show that the mean LGD needs to be increased by about 35% to 41% for a corporate portfolio and about 16% for a mid-market portfolio in order to compensate for the lack of correlations. Our hope is to provide a framework that the banks can use based on their internal data to estimate and justify their LGD choices for different portfolios. Although the paper is presented within the context of Basel II, the applications could be widened to include structured finance, credit derivatives, economic capital and portfolio modeling in general, where PD and LGD correlations need to be estimated and modeled.

Key concepts: Loss given default, Basel II, Capital requirement, Portfolio, Probability of default, Credit risk, Basel III, Econometrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Basel requirements of downturn loss given default: modeling and estimating probability of default and loss given default correlations — Research Paper | ScholarLens