On the large error introduced in the estimate of the density of membrane pores from permeability measurements when diffusion in "unstirred layer" within the cells is disregarded.

After the development of the "black lipid membrane" techniques, studies of the permeability of labeled water and nonelectrolytes across these artificial membranes have yielded permeability constants comparable in magnitude to those obtained from tracer studies of living cell membranes. This general agreement has affirmed the belief that the living cell membranes are indeed closely similar to these bilayer phospholipid membranes. In this report, we draw attention to a hidden assumption behind such comparisons made: the assumption that labeled material passing through the cell membrane barriers instantly reaches diffusion equilibrium inside the cell. The permeability constants to labeled water (and nonelectrolytes) across lipid layers were obtained using setups in which the lipid membrane was sandwiched between aqueous compartments both of which were vigorously stirred. In studies of permeability of living cell membranes only the outside solution was stirred, the intracellular water remained stationary. Yet the calculations of permeability constants of the cell membrane were made with the tacit assumption, that once the labeled materials pass through the cell membrane, they were instantly mixed with the entire cell contents as if a stirrer operating at infinite speed had been present inside the cells. Ignoring this unstirred condition of the intracellular water, in fact, lumped all the real-life delay due to diffusion in the cytoplasm and added it to the resistance to diffusion of the membrane barrier. The result is an estimated membrane permeability to labeled water (and nonelectrolytes) many times slower than it actually is. The present report begins with a detailed analysis of a specific case: tritiated water diffusion from giant barnacle muscle fibers and two non-living models, one real, one imagined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)