2006The AnthropologistRequires access

Relationship Between Anthropometric Measurements and Body Composition Among Santal Girls Aged Between 6-18 Years of Galudih, Jharkhand, India

Diptendu Chatterjee, Jyoti Ratan Ghosh, Sudeshna Chanda, Arup Ratan Bandyopadhyay

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

A cross sectional study of 116 Santal girls was undertaken to compare the relationship of biceps and triceps skinfolds, waist, hip and mid upper arm circumferences, waist-hip ratio and conicity index with three body composition variables; percentage of body fat, fat mass and fat free mass of the anthropometric characteristics. Waist circumference displayed the strongest correlations (p,0.001) with present body fat (r=0.85) and fat mass (r=0.86). Waist-hip ratio did not significant correlation with any measure of body composition. The correlation of conicity index with body composition measures was intermediate between those of waist circumference and waist-hip ratio. Results also revealed that the greatest amount of variation of percentage of body fat (73.1%) and fat mass (75.5%) was explained by waist circumference. In conclusion the present study showed that waist circumference is much more strongly associated with body fat than other anthropometric measures including waist-hip ratio and conicity index. Thus the use of waist circumference instead of waist-hip ratio or conicity index could be advantageous in epidemiological and clinical studies which deals with the relationship of central adiposity with percentage of body fat and fat mass.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A cross sectional study of 116 Santal girls was undertaken to compare the relationship of biceps and triceps skinfolds, waist, hip and mid upper arm circumferences, waist-hip ratio and conicity index with three body composition variables; percentage of body fat, fat mass and fat free mass of the anthropometric characteristics. Waist circumference displayed the strongest correlations (p,0.001) with present body fat (r=0.85) and fat mass (r=0.86). Waist-hip ratio did not significant correlation with any measure of body composition. The correlation of conicity index with body composition measures was intermediate between those of waist circumference and waist-hip ratio. Results also revealed that the greatest amount of variation of percentage of body fat (73.1%) and fat mass (75.5%) was explained by waist circumference. In conclusion the present study showed that waist circumference is much more strongly associated with body fat than other anthropometric measures including waist-hip ratio and conicity index. Thus the use of waist circumference instead of waist-hip ratio or conicity index could be advantageous in epidemiological and clinical studies which deals with the relationship of central adiposity with percentage of body fat and fat mass.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A cross sectional study of 116 Santal girls was undertaken to compare the relationship of biceps and triceps skinfolds, waist, hip and mid upper arm circumferences, waist-hip ratio and conicity index with three body composition variables; percentage of body fat, fat mass and fat free mass of the anthropometric characteristics. Waist circumference displayed the strongest correlations (p,0.001) with present body fat (r=0.85) and fat mass (r=0.86). Waist-hip ratio did not significant correlation with any measure of body composition. The correlation of conicity index with body composition measures was intermediate between those of waist circumference and waist-hip ratio. Results also revealed that the greatest amount of variation of percentage of body fat (73.1%) and fat mass (75.5%) was explained by waist circumference. In conclusion the present study showed that waist circumference is much more strongly associated with body fat than other anthropometric measures including waist-hip ratio and conicity index. Thus the use of waist circumference instead of waist-hip ratio or conicity index could be advantageous in epidemiological and clinical studies which deals with the relationship of central adiposity with percentage of body fat and fat mass.

Key concepts: Waist, Circumference, Anthropometry, Body mass index, Waist–hip ratio, Body adiposity index, Waist-to-height ratio, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relationship Between Anthropometric Measurements and Body Composition Among Santal Girls Aged Between 6-18 Years of Galudih, Jharkhand, India — Research Paper | ScholarLens