2006•Unpublished venueRequires access

Banks as dealers of credit money: Comparing the roles of banks and non-banks in the provision of liquidity

Junfeng Qiu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Using a general equilibrium monetary model for banks, we analyze the role of banks in providing liquidity to the financial market and the transmission of the financial liquidity channel of monetary policy. In the model, the roles of banks in the payment system give banks additional abilities to provide liquidity. Because bank deposits can be used as means of payment, banks can directly create and lend new deposits that are not backed by money collected from depositors. As a result, the private banking system has the ability to supply loans elastically to meet the stochastic liquidity needs of the economy with very little need to borrow from the central bank. We show that the existence of banks is important to non-banks. When aggregate liquidity is limited, the attempt of non-bank investment funds to provide more liquidity insurance to shareholders may lead to higher volatility in asset prices without actually giving more liquidity to shareholders. New inside money provided by banks can reduce the volatility of asset prices and help non-banks perform their risk-sharing functions more effectively. We also show how the interest rate policy can be transmitted to asset prices by affecting the liquidity constraint of banks.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Using a general equilibrium monetary model for banks, we analyze the role of banks in providing liquidity to the financial market and the transmission of the financial liquidity channel of monetary policy. In the model, the roles of banks in the payment system give banks additional abilities to provide liquidity. Because bank deposits can be used as means of payment, banks can directly create and lend new deposits that are not backed by money collected from depositors. As a result, the private banking system has the ability to supply loans elastically to meet the stochastic liquidity needs of the economy with very little need to borrow from the central bank. We show that the existence of banks is important to non-banks. When aggregate liquidity is limited, the attempt of non-bank investment funds to provide more liquidity insurance to shareholders may lead to higher volatility in asset prices without actually giving more liquidity to shareholders. New inside money provided by banks can reduce the volatility of asset prices and help non-banks perform their risk-sharing functions more effectively. We also show how the interest rate policy can be transmitted to asset prices by affecting the liquidity constraint of banks.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Using a general equilibrium monetary model for banks, we analyze the role of banks in providing liquidity to the financial market and the transmission of the financial liquidity channel of monetary policy. In the model, the roles of banks in the payment system give banks additional abilities to provide liquidity. Because bank deposits can be used as means of payment, banks can directly create and lend new deposits that are not backed by money collected from depositors. As a result, the private banking system has the ability to supply loans elastically to meet the stochastic liquidity needs of the economy with very little need to borrow from the central bank. We show that the existence of banks is important to non-banks. When aggregate liquidity is limited, the attempt of non-bank investment funds to provide more liquidity insurance to shareholders may lead to higher volatility in asset prices without actually giving more liquidity to shareholders. New inside money provided by banks can reduce the volatility of asset prices and help non-banks perform their risk-sharing functions more effectively. We also show how the interest rate policy can be transmitted to asset prices by affecting the liquidity constraint of banks.

Key concepts: Market liquidity, Accounting liquidity, Open market operation, Business, Liquidity crisis, Liquidity risk, Monetary economics, Financial system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Banks as dealers of credit money: Comparing the roles of banks and non-banks in the provision of liquidity — Research Paper | ScholarLens