2009Unpublished venueRequires access

The Challenge of Civil Justice Reform: Effective Court Management of Litigation

Adrian Zuckerman

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

The Civil Justice Reform has culminated in important rule changes to the Rules of the High Court and to the Rule of the District Court. Although the general framework of civil litigation remains largely the same, the new rules radically change the way in which the litigation process is managed. It is now for the court to determine the intensity and pace of the litigation process by imposing on the parties case management adapted to the needs of the particular case. The court's case management task is guided by the underlying objectives. These make it plain that the courts must not only decide cases in accordance with the law and the true facts but also by the use of proportionate court and party resources and with reasonable expedition. The new rules introduce thereby a three-dimensional concept of justice, in which efficiency and expedition are as important as the correctness of the outcome. However, court management will achieve the underlying objectives only if parties comply with case management deadlines. In this regard, the Hong Kong rules are better designed to secure timely compliance than their English counterpart and are, therefore, more likely to achieve the intended objectives.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Civil Justice Reform has culminated in important rule changes to the Rules of the High Court and to the Rule of the District Court. Although the general framework of civil litigation remains largely the same, the new rules radically change the way in which the litigation process is managed. It is now for the court to determine the intensity and pace of the litigation process by imposing on the parties case management adapted to the needs of the particular case. The court's case management task is guided by the underlying objectives. These make it plain that the courts must not only decide cases in accordance with the law and the true facts but also by the use of proportionate court and party resources and with reasonable expedition. The new rules introduce thereby a three-dimensional concept of justice, in which efficiency and expedition are as important as the correctness of the outcome. However, court management will achieve the underlying objectives only if parties comply with case management deadlines. In this regard, the Hong Kong rules are better designed to secure timely compliance than their English counterpart and are, therefore, more likely to achieve the intended objectives.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Civil Justice Reform has culminated in important rule changes to the Rules of the High Court and to the Rule of the District Court. Although the general framework of civil litigation remains largely the same, the new rules radically change the way in which the litigation process is managed. It is now for the court to determine the intensity and pace of the litigation process by imposing on the parties case management adapted to the needs of the particular case. The court's case management task is guided by the underlying objectives. These make it plain that the courts must not only decide cases in accordance with the law and the true facts but also by the use of proportionate court and party resources and with reasonable expedition. The new rules introduce thereby a three-dimensional concept of justice, in which efficiency and expedition are as important as the correctness of the outcome. However, court management will achieve the underlying objectives only if parties comply with case management deadlines. In this regard, the Hong Kong rules are better designed to secure timely compliance than their English counterpart and are, therefore, more likely to achieve the intended objectives.

Key concepts: Pace, Law, Civil procedure, Political science, Economic Justice, Court of record, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Redress

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Challenge of Civil Justice Reform: Effective Court Management of Litigation — Research Paper | ScholarLens