Labor supply elasticities and borrowing constraints
David Domeij, Martin Flodén
Abstract
David Domeij, Martin Flodén
Abstract
The labor-supply elasticity used in typical macroeconomic models is higher than the elasticity that labor economists estimate from microdata. We argue that assumptions underlying previous econometric estimates of the intertemporal labor supply elasticity are not consistent with heterogeneous agents economies with incomplete markets. In particular, if the econometrician ignores borrowing constraints, the elasticity will be biased downwards. Our preliminary finding is that this bias may be up to 50 percent.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The labor-supply elasticity used in typical macroeconomic models is higher than the elasticity that labor economists estimate from microdata. We argue that assumptions underlying previous econometric estimates of the intertemporal labor supply elasticity are not consistent with heterogeneous agents economies with incomplete markets. In particular, if the econometrician ignores borrowing constraints, the elasticity will be biased downwards. Our preliminary finding is that this bias may be up to 50 percent.
Key concepts: Economics, Microdata (statistics), Elasticity (physics), Price elasticity of supply, Econometrics, Incomplete markets, Price elasticity of demand, Microeconomics