2011Unpublished venueRequires access

Job Design, Change and Technology In Relation To Job Evaluation - A Reflective View

Muhammad Ali EL-Hajji

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper intends to focus on the important issues and questions related to job design in the context of job evaluation. In particular: can job design be influenced by the work culture of an organization? What are the main situations that call for job design and / or redesign? How / when does job design interact and deal with the changes in job content? How does job design seek to combine the dynamic nature of work in a high-technology society? How do change, technological development and growth in an organizations size, affect job demand / job content, the organizations pay system and the job holder? How does job design itself demonstrate that it is a dynamic process, a task-focused process designed to make sure that jobs are structured / restructured / reorganized / right sized (including downsizing) to fit a task rather than the task performer (i.e. where the job- holder is (recruited) to fit the job, but not vice versa). In so doing, can job design make an organizations performance more effective and more efficient, and if so how? Can the combination of job design and job evaluation processes accentuate job evaluation flexibility and responsiveness? Here lies the challenge. For job evaluation must be able to be adaptable, responsive and capable of satisfying all the new developments that result from job design or redesign, rather than for it to be seen as a rigid or inflexible system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper intends to focus on the important issues and questions related to job design in the context of job evaluation. In particular: can job design be influenced by the work culture of an organization? What are the main situations that call for job design and / or redesign? How / when does job design interact and deal with the changes in job content? How does job design seek to combine the dynamic nature of work in a high-technology society? How do change, technological development and growth in an organizations size, affect job demand / job content, the organizations pay system and the job holder? How does job design itself demonstrate that it is a dynamic process, a task-focused process designed to make sure that jobs are structured / restructured / reorganized / right sized (including downsizing) to fit a task rather than the task performer (i.e. where the job- holder is (recruited) to fit the job, but not vice versa). In so doing, can job design make an organizations performance more effective and more efficient, and if so how? Can the combination of job design and job evaluation processes accentuate job evaluation flexibility and responsiveness? Here lies the challenge. For job evaluation must be able to be adaptable, responsive and capable of satisfying all the new developments that result from job design or redesign, rather than for it to be seen as a rigid or inflexible system.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper intends to focus on the important issues and questions related to job design in the context of job evaluation. In particular: can job design be influenced by the work culture of an organization? What are the main situations that call for job design and / or redesign? How / when does job design interact and deal with the changes in job content? How does job design seek to combine the dynamic nature of work in a high-technology society? How do change, technological development and growth in an organizations size, affect job demand / job content, the organizations pay system and the job holder? How does job design itself demonstrate that it is a dynamic process, a task-focused process designed to make sure that jobs are structured / restructured / reorganized / right sized (including downsizing) to fit a task rather than the task performer (i.e. where the job- holder is (recruited) to fit the job, but not vice versa). In so doing, can job design make an organizations performance more effective and more efficient, and if so how? Can the combination of job design and job evaluation processes accentuate job evaluation flexibility and responsiveness? Here lies the challenge. For job evaluation must be able to be adaptable, responsive and capable of satisfying all the new developments that result from job design or redesign, rather than for it to be seen as a rigid or inflexible system.

Key concepts: Job design, Job analysis, Job shadow, Job enrichment, Job characteristic theory, Job attitude, Job rotation, Flexibility (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Job Design, Change and Technology In Relation To Job Evaluation - A Reflective View — Research Paper | ScholarLens