2007Unpublished venueRequires access

DYNAMICS OF CONTROLLED BOUNDARY LAYER SEPARATION

Václav Uruba, M. Knob

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The results of experimental study on a boundary layer separation control are given in the paper. The boundary layer on a flat wall is subjected to adverse pressure gradient. Three control strategies have been chosen for the study, both passive (rough wall, vortex generator) and active (synthetic jet). The separation process is investigated using TR-PIV method. Dynamical aspects of the phenomenon are analyzed in details. Experimental setup The blow-down aerodynamic rig of IT has been used for the experiment. The test section for generation of adverse pressure gradient in channel was designed and manufactured. In Fig. 1 the schema of experimental setup is shown. The section A represents the starting point of adverse pressure gradient region as well as the origin of the streamwise position coordinate x. The cross-section in A position is 100 x 100 mm2. Downstream of this section, the upper wall is inclined with angle α = 16°, while the bottom plane wall is used to study the boundary layer separation. To prevent separation from the upper wall, this is permeable and aspirated. The section B represents the “mean” position of a boundary layer separation (please note, that the separation point is not stable). Fig. 1 – Schema of the experimental setup A B

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The results of experimental study on a boundary layer separation control are given in the paper. The boundary layer on a flat wall is subjected to adverse pressure gradient. Three control strategies have been chosen for the study, both passive (rough wall, vortex generator) and active (synthetic jet). The separation process is investigated using TR-PIV method. Dynamical aspects of the phenomenon are analyzed in details. Experimental setup The blow-down aerodynamic rig of IT has been used for the experiment. The test section for generation of adverse pressure gradient in channel was designed and manufactured. In Fig. 1 the schema of experimental setup is shown. The section A represents the starting point of adverse pressure gradient region as well as the origin of the streamwise position coordinate x. The cross-section in A position is 100 x 100 mm2. Downstream of this section, the upper wall is inclined with angle α = 16°, while the bottom plane wall is used to study the boundary layer separation. To prevent separation from the upper wall, this is permeable and aspirated. The section B represents the “mean” position of a boundary layer separation (please note, that the separation point is not stable). Fig. 1 – Schema of the experimental setup A B

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The results of experimental study on a boundary layer separation control are given in the paper. The boundary layer on a flat wall is subjected to adverse pressure gradient. Three control strategies have been chosen for the study, both passive (rough wall, vortex generator) and active (synthetic jet). The separation process is investigated using TR-PIV method. Dynamical aspects of the phenomenon are analyzed in details. Experimental setup The blow-down aerodynamic rig of IT has been used for the experiment. The test section for generation of adverse pressure gradient in channel was designed and manufactured. In Fig. 1 the schema of experimental setup is shown. The section A represents the starting point of adverse pressure gradient region as well as the origin of the streamwise position coordinate x. The cross-section in A position is 100 x 100 mm2. Downstream of this section, the upper wall is inclined with angle α = 16°, while the bottom plane wall is used to study the boundary layer separation. To prevent separation from the upper wall, this is permeable and aspirated. The section B represents the “mean” position of a boundary layer separation (please note, that the separation point is not stable). Fig. 1 – Schema of the experimental setup A B

Key concepts: Adverse pressure gradient, Flow separation, Boundary layer, Separation (statistics), Boundary layer control, Mechanics, Vortex generator, Pressure gradient

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DYNAMICS OF CONTROLLED BOUNDARY LAYER SEPARATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens