Classical Versus Generative Phonology
Ayo Ogunsiji, Adesina B. Sunday
Abstract
Ayo Ogunsiji, Adesina B. Sunday
Abstract
This paper examines the basic views of classical and generative phonology. It then considers the similarities and differences in the two theoretical models. Both approaches focus on the sounds of human language and are both offshoots of structural grammar. They also recognize the level of phonetic representation. However, classical phonology is preoccupied with phonemicising, while generative phonology is concerned with the generation of rules that apply to the phonemic level of representation to yield the phonetic level of representation. Besides, while classical phonology sees the phoneme as irreducible, generative phonology sees it as a bundle of features.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper examines the basic views of classical and generative phonology. It then considers the similarities and differences in the two theoretical models. Both approaches focus on the sounds of human language and are both offshoots of structural grammar. They also recognize the level of phonetic representation. However, classical phonology is preoccupied with phonemicising, while generative phonology is concerned with the generation of rules that apply to the phonemic level of representation to yield the phonetic level of representation. Besides, while classical phonology sees the phoneme as irreducible, generative phonology sees it as a bundle of features.
Key concepts: Phonology, Generative grammar, Linguistics, Representation (politics), Grammar, Computer science, Philosophy, Political science