2011Unpublished venueRequires access

Classical Versus Generative Phonology

Ayo Ogunsiji, Adesina B. Sunday

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the basic views of classical and generative phonology. It then considers the similarities and differences in the two theoretical models. Both approaches focus on the sounds of human language and are both offshoots of structural grammar. They also recognize the level of phonetic representation. However, classical phonology is preoccupied with phonemicising, while generative phonology is concerned with the generation of rules that apply to the phonemic level of representation to yield the phonetic level of representation. Besides, while classical phonology sees the phoneme as irreducible, generative phonology sees it as a bundle of features.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper examines the basic views of classical and generative phonology. It then considers the similarities and differences in the two theoretical models. Both approaches focus on the sounds of human language and are both offshoots of structural grammar. They also recognize the level of phonetic representation. However, classical phonology is preoccupied with phonemicising, while generative phonology is concerned with the generation of rules that apply to the phonemic level of representation to yield the phonetic level of representation. Besides, while classical phonology sees the phoneme as irreducible, generative phonology sees it as a bundle of features.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper examines the basic views of classical and generative phonology. It then considers the similarities and differences in the two theoretical models. Both approaches focus on the sounds of human language and are both offshoots of structural grammar. They also recognize the level of phonetic representation. However, classical phonology is preoccupied with phonemicising, while generative phonology is concerned with the generation of rules that apply to the phonemic level of representation to yield the phonetic level of representation. Besides, while classical phonology sees the phoneme as irreducible, generative phonology sees it as a bundle of features.

Key concepts: Phonology, Generative grammar, Linguistics, Representation (politics), Grammar, Computer science, Philosophy, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Classical Versus Generative Phonology — Research Paper | ScholarLens