2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Sources of Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 1

Samuel Fambon

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to carry out an empirical analysis of the sources of income inequality in Cameroon. The methods of quantile regression and total income inequality decomposition into population sub-groups are used to analyze the data of the third Cameroonian household survey (ECAM3). The results derived from decomposition analysis show that there exist considerable differences in the average consumption expenditure of households and in within-groups inequality. However, in spite of these differences, in all the groups considered, between-groups inequality only explains a small proportion of total inequality. Quantile regression analysis reveals the net positive effects of human resources and of social and physical capital on the level of consumption expenditure per adult equivalent at all the points of the expenditure distribution. The study also reveals a number of demographic effects in the urban and rural areas among which the most significant is caused by household size which contributes to the reduction of the household consumption expenditure across all the quantiles of the expenditure distribution. Moreover, regions where households reside also affect household consumption expenditure. Those who work in the services and trade sectors of the economy are better well-off than those who work in the other sectors of the economy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this paper is to carry out an empirical analysis of the sources of income inequality in Cameroon. The methods of quantile regression and total income inequality decomposition into population sub-groups are used to analyze the data of the third Cameroonian household survey (ECAM3). The results derived from decomposition analysis show that there exist considerable differences in the average consumption expenditure of households and in within-groups inequality. However, in spite of these differences, in all the groups considered, between-groups inequality only explains a small proportion of total inequality. Quantile regression analysis reveals the net positive effects of human resources and of social and physical capital on the level of consumption expenditure per adult equivalent at all the points of the expenditure distribution. The study also reveals a number of demographic effects in the urban and rural areas among which the most significant is caused by household size which contributes to the reduction of the household consumption expenditure across all the quantiles of the expenditure distribution. Moreover, regions where households reside also affect household consumption expenditure. Those who work in the services and trade sectors of the economy are better well-off than those who work in the other sectors of the economy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this paper is to carry out an empirical analysis of the sources of income inequality in Cameroon. The methods of quantile regression and total income inequality decomposition into population sub-groups are used to analyze the data of the third Cameroonian household survey (ECAM3). The results derived from decomposition analysis show that there exist considerable differences in the average consumption expenditure of households and in within-groups inequality. However, in spite of these differences, in all the groups considered, between-groups inequality only explains a small proportion of total inequality. Quantile regression analysis reveals the net positive effects of human resources and of social and physical capital on the level of consumption expenditure per adult equivalent at all the points of the expenditure distribution. The study also reveals a number of demographic effects in the urban and rural areas among which the most significant is caused by household size which contributes to the reduction of the household consumption expenditure across all the quantiles of the expenditure distribution. Moreover, regions where households reside also affect household consumption expenditure. Those who work in the services and trade sectors of the economy are better well-off than those who work in the other sectors of the economy.

Key concepts: Quantile regression, Economics, Inequality, Consumption (sociology), Distribution (mathematics), Demographic economics, Economic inequality, Income distribution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sources of Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon 1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens