2015Constructivist FoundationsRequires access

The Tensions between Second-Order Cybernetics and Traditional Academic Conferences

David Griffiths, Philip Baron

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Richards’s long history and commitment to cybernetics provides a well-rounded view of the dichotomy between the traditional conference and one aspiring for second-order cybernetic attributes. We …

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Richards’s long history and commitment to cybernetics provides a well-rounded view of the dichotomy between the traditional conference and one aspiring for second-order cybernetic attributes. We …

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Richards’s long history and commitment to cybernetics provides a well-rounded view of the dichotomy between the traditional conference and one aspiring for second-order cybernetic attributes. We …

Key concepts: Neurophenomenology, Enactivism, Autopoiesis, Constructivism (international relations), Cybernetics, Epistemology, Order (exchange), Cognitive science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Tensions between Second-Order Cybernetics and Traditional Academic Conferences — Research Paper | ScholarLens