Comparison of 3 absolute gravimeters based on different methods for the e-MASS project
Sébastien Merlet, Giancarlo D’Agostino, Alessandro Germak, Henri Baumann, Quentin Bodart, A. Louchet, Arnaud Landragin, Franck Pereira dos Santos
Abstract
Sébastien Merlet, Giancarlo D’Agostino, Alessandro Germak, Henri Baumann, Quentin Bodart, A. Louchet, Arnaud Landragin, Franck Pereira dos Santos
Abstract
The three INMs involved in the JRP e-MASS project operate three different absolute gravimeters, which rely on three different measurement methods. METAS operates a commercial FG5 gravimeter, INRIM has been developing his own ballistic symmetrical rise-and-fall gravimeter IMGC-2 and LNE-SYRTE develops a cold atom gravimeter. These gravimeters are briefly described in this paper and their differences and performances are discussed. The results of a comparison performed at the LNE laboratory will be presented.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The three INMs involved in the JRP e-MASS project operate three different absolute gravimeters, which rely on three different measurement methods. METAS operates a commercial FG5 gravimeter, INRIM has been developing his own ballistic symmetrical rise-and-fall gravimeter IMGC-2 and LNE-SYRTE develops a cold atom gravimeter. These gravimeters are briefly described in this paper and their differences and performances are discussed. The results of a comparison performed at the LNE laboratory will be presented.
Key concepts: Gravimeter, Geodesy, Physics, Geology, Geophysics, Casing