2015•ClimactericRequires access

Pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of two vaginal gel formulations of ultra-low-dose estriol in postmenopausal women

Juan Luis Delgado⋈, José Lois Estévez, Milko Massimiliano Radicioni, Luca Loprete, Jaime Moscoso del Prado, Concepción Nieto Magro

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety and preliminary effectiveness of ultra-low-dose estriol vaginal gel formulations (20 μg/g (T1) and 50 μg/g (T2)) compared to Ovestinon® (estriol 500 μg/0.5 g (R)) and placebo in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Forty-three volunteers were randomly assigned to received T1, T2, R or placebo once daily for 21 days. Absorption of estriol after single and multiple administration was analyzed. Cytological changes in the vagina, tolerability and safety were also investigated. RESULTS: Thirty-six women were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Systemic absorption was lower with test formulations (AUC0-t: 171.65 ± 80.18 (T1) and 406.75 ± 199.53 (T2) pg/ml × h) than with Ovestinon® (1221.97 ± 549.06 pg/ml × h). Estriol exposure of the test formulations after multiple administration (AUCss: 36.33 ± 30.52 (T1) and 73.71 ± 46.86 (T2) pg/ml × h) was significantly lower than after single-dose administration and not significantly different between them. In contrast, the exposure after repeated administration of Ovestinon® was considerable and not statistically different from levels after single administration. All estriol formulations produced similar improvement in the vaginal maturation value, while placebo showed a small and not significant change. Overall safety and acceptability were good. CONCLUSIONS: Estriol 20 and 50 μg/g formulations, while showing a comparable capacity for reversing vaginal atrophy, present a highly favorable safety profile, producing a very low systemic absorption of estriol and significantly lower than that of Ovestinon®.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety and preliminary effectiveness of ultra-low-dose estriol vaginal gel formulations (20 μg/g (T1) and 50 μg/g (T2)) compared to Ovestinon® (estriol 500 μg/0.5 g (R)) and placebo in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Forty-three volunteers were randomly assigned to received T1, T2, R or placebo once daily for 21 days. Absorption of estriol after single and multiple administration was analyzed. Cytological changes in the vagina, tolerability and safety were also investigated. RESULTS: Thirty-six women were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Systemic absorption was lower with test formulations (AUC0-t: 171.65 ± 80.18 (T1) and 406.75 ± 199.53 (T2) pg/ml × h) than with Ovestinon® (1221.97 ± 549.06 pg/ml × h). Estriol exposure of the test formulations after multiple administration (AUCss: 36.33 ± 30.52 (T1) and 73.71 ± 46.86 (T2) pg/ml × h) was significantly lower than after single-dose administration and not significantly different between them. In contrast, the exposure after repeated administration of Ovestinon® was considerable and not statistically different from levels after single administration. All estriol formulations produced similar improvement in the vaginal maturation value, while placebo showed a small and not significant change. Overall safety and acceptability were good. CONCLUSIONS: Estriol 20 and 50 μg/g formulations, while showing a comparable capacity for reversing vaginal atrophy, present a highly favorable safety profile, producing a very low systemic absorption of estriol and significantly lower than that of Ovestinon®.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety and preliminary effectiveness of ultra-low-dose estriol vaginal gel formulations (20 μg/g (T1) and 50 μg/g (T2)) compared to Ovestinon® (estriol 500 μg/0.5 g (R)) and placebo in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Forty-three volunteers were randomly assigned to received T1, T2, R or placebo once daily for 21 days. Absorption of estriol after single and multiple administration was analyzed. Cytological changes in the vagina, tolerability and safety were also investigated. RESULTS: Thirty-six women were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Systemic absorption was lower with test formulations (AUC0-t: 171.65 ± 80.18 (T1) and 406.75 ± 199.53 (T2) pg/ml × h) than with Ovestinon® (1221.97 ± 549.06 pg/ml × h). Estriol exposure of the test formulations after multiple administration (AUCss: 36.33 ± 30.52 (T1) and 73.71 ± 46.86 (T2) pg/ml × h) was significantly lower than after single-dose administration and not significantly different between them. In contrast, the exposure after repeated administration of Ovestinon® was considerable and not statistically different from levels after single administration. All estriol formulations produced similar improvement in the vaginal maturation value, while placebo showed a small and not significant change. Overall safety and acceptability were good. CONCLUSIONS: Estriol 20 and 50 μg/g formulations, while showing a comparable capacity for reversing vaginal atrophy, present a highly favorable safety profile, producing a very low systemic absorption of estriol and significantly lower than that of Ovestinon®.

Key concepts: Estriol, Medicine, Placebo, Vaginal atrophy, Pharmacokinetics, Tolerability, Dosing, Intravaginal administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of two vaginal gel formulations of ultra-low-dose estriol in postmenopausal women — Research Paper | ScholarLens