Performance Measures for Electronic Journals
Julie M. Hurd, Deborah D. Blecic, Ann E. Robinson
Abstract
Julie M. Hurd, Deborah D. Blecic, Ann E. Robinson
Abstract
SUMMARY Libraries are spending increasing amounts to provide access to electronic journals. The decision to move toward digital collections is grounded in the belief that electronic journals offer significant benefits over their print counterparts. At present there is very little data to support that position because performance measures for electronic journals have not been fully developed. This paper describes a pilot study to test a methodology for evaluating electronic journals employing user-centered criteria. The study examined science and health sciences journal titles for which the library holds both paper and electronic subscriptions.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
SUMMARY Libraries are spending increasing amounts to provide access to electronic journals. The decision to move toward digital collections is grounded in the belief that electronic journals offer significant benefits over their print counterparts. At present there is very little data to support that position because performance measures for electronic journals have not been fully developed. This paper describes a pilot study to test a methodology for evaluating electronic journals employing user-centered criteria. The study examined science and health sciences journal titles for which the library holds both paper and electronic subscriptions.
Key concepts: Library science, Computer science, Information retrieval