2015Korean Journal of SociologyRequires access

Modernity/Modernities and Personal Life

Stevi Jackson

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

This paper addresses some of the issues raised by thinking about social change, personal life and gender relations in both European and Asian contexts. In particular it is framed as a response to the Eurocentrism of much contemporary theorizing on modernity and the gaps or lacunae in attempts to counter this. While there are a number of relevant academic discussions on modernity and /or intimacy they are taking place in separate intellectual arenas so that connections between them are not always made. Here I pull out some strands of these arguments, focusing on the work of two scholars, Gurminder Bhambra and Chang Kyung-Sup, to raise questions about how we imagine and theorize modernity, gender and intimacy from our differing locations and how we might do so more productively and without taking western modernity as a benchmark against which the rest of the world is compared.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper addresses some of the issues raised by thinking about social change, personal life and gender relations in both European and Asian contexts. In particular it is framed as a response to the Eurocentrism of much contemporary theorizing on modernity and the gaps or lacunae in attempts to counter this. While there are a number of relevant academic discussions on modernity and /or intimacy they are taking place in separate intellectual arenas so that connections between them are not always made. Here I pull out some strands of these arguments, focusing on the work of two scholars, Gurminder Bhambra and Chang Kyung-Sup, to raise questions about how we imagine and theorize modernity, gender and intimacy from our differing locations and how we might do so more productively and without taking western modernity as a benchmark against which the rest of the world is compared.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper addresses some of the issues raised by thinking about social change, personal life and gender relations in both European and Asian contexts. In particular it is framed as a response to the Eurocentrism of much contemporary theorizing on modernity and the gaps or lacunae in attempts to counter this. While there are a number of relevant academic discussions on modernity and /or intimacy they are taking place in separate intellectual arenas so that connections between them are not always made. Here I pull out some strands of these arguments, focusing on the work of two scholars, Gurminder Bhambra and Chang Kyung-Sup, to raise questions about how we imagine and theorize modernity, gender and intimacy from our differing locations and how we might do so more productively and without taking western modernity as a benchmark against which the rest of the world is compared.

Key concepts: Modernity, Eurocentrism, Sociology, Gender studies, Epistemology, Aesthetics, Anthropology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modernity/Modernities and Personal Life — Research Paper | ScholarLens