2000CopeiaRequires access

Phylogenetic Relationships and Divergence Timing ofCrocodylusBased on Morphology and the Fossil Record

Christopher A. Brochu

Open publisher page 138 citations

Abstract

Maximum parsimony analysis of 164 morphological characters supports the monophyly of crown-genus Crocodylus relative to other extant lineages. Crocodylus cataphractus is the basalmost living species, and monophyletic New World and Indopacific assemblages are supported. The Indian Mugger (Crocodylus palustris) is closely related to the Indopacific assemblage. Most fossils assigned to Crocodylus do not belong to the crown genus. Only one extinct fossil included in the analysis, Crocodylus palaeindicus (= C. sivalensis), falls within the crown-group Crocodylus and is of uncertain affinities within the group; Adams consensus trees draw C. palaeindicus toward the root of non–cataphractus Crocodylus, and the Nile crocodile (C. niloticus) is the sister taxon to the New World assemblage. The oldest fossil diagnostically belonging to the clade is from the Late Miocene, which is congruent with previous protein distance estimates of a Late Tertiary divergence among living species. Fossils and molecules never actually clashed regarding divergence timing, because very different meanings were applied to the name Crocodylus by paleontologists and neontologists.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Maximum parsimony analysis of 164 morphological characters supports the monophyly of crown-genus Crocodylus relative to other extant lineages. Crocodylus cataphractus is the basalmost living species, and monophyletic New World and Indopacific assemblages are supported. The Indian Mugger (Crocodylus palustris) is closely related to the Indopacific assemblage. Most fossils assigned to Crocodylus do not belong to the crown genus. Only one extinct fossil included in the analysis, Crocodylus palaeindicus (= C. sivalensis), falls within the crown-group Crocodylus and is of uncertain affinities within the group; Adams consensus trees draw C. palaeindicus toward the root of non–cataphractus Crocodylus, and the Nile crocodile (C. niloticus) is the sister taxon to the New World assemblage. The oldest fossil diagnostically belonging to the clade is from the Late Miocene, which is congruent with previous protein distance estimates of a Late Tertiary divergence among living species. Fossils and molecules never actually clashed regarding divergence timing, because very different meanings were applied to the name Crocodylus by paleontologists and neontologists.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 138 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Maximum parsimony analysis of 164 morphological characters supports the monophyly of crown-genus Crocodylus relative to other extant lineages. Crocodylus cataphractus is the basalmost living species, and monophyletic New World and Indopacific assemblages are supported. The Indian Mugger (Crocodylus palustris) is closely related to the Indopacific assemblage. Most fossils assigned to Crocodylus do not belong to the crown genus. Only one extinct fossil included in the analysis, Crocodylus palaeindicus (= C. sivalensis), falls within the crown-group Crocodylus and is of uncertain affinities within the group; Adams consensus trees draw C. palaeindicus toward the root of non–cataphractus Crocodylus, and the Nile crocodile (C. niloticus) is the sister taxon to the New World assemblage. The oldest fossil diagnostically belonging to the clade is from the Late Miocene, which is congruent with previous protein distance estimates of a Late Tertiary divergence among living species. Fossils and molecules never actually clashed regarding divergence timing, because very different meanings were applied to the name Crocodylus by paleontologists and neontologists.

Key concepts: Crocodylus, Monophyly, Biology, Genus, Zoology, Taxon, Clade, Phylogenetic tree

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phylogenetic Relationships and Divergence Timing ofCrocodylusBased on Morphology and the Fossil Record — Research Paper | ScholarLens