1991•Unpublished venueRequires access

IMPROVING THE PROTECTION OF RESTRAINED FRONT SEAT OCCUPANTS IN FRONTAL CRASHES

Danius J. Dalmotas, E. R. Welbourne

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper restates the principles that underlie Transport Canada's policy on occupant restraints. Those principles require both improvements in the protection of the individual occupant and increases in benefits to society through the more general use of restraint systems. Progress in seat belt use in Canada is summarized. The effectiveness of current three-point seat belts in preventing fatalities in frontal collisions is briefly reviewed. The residual injury problem in frontal collisions of equivalent or lower severity to the standard 48 km/h frontal barrier test is defined with reference to recent accident data. Performance of current systems in actual collisions and in the frontal barrier test is compared. It is concluded that requiring all occupant restraint systems to meet the alternative set of performance criteria, recently proposed by Transport Canada for automatic seat belts, would significantly improve their performance. Requiring only the use of available technology, the primary effect of those criteria would be virtually to preclude injurious head and facial contacts with the vehicle interior in collisions of the regulated collision severity. Objective methods of defining seat belt fit are still required, in particular to reduce the incidence of belt-induced abdominal injury. (A) For the covering abstract of the conference see IRRD 864606.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper restates the principles that underlie Transport Canada's policy on occupant restraints. Those principles require both improvements in the protection of the individual occupant and increases in benefits to society through the more general use of restraint systems. Progress in seat belt use in Canada is summarized. The effectiveness of current three-point seat belts in preventing fatalities in frontal collisions is briefly reviewed. The residual injury problem in frontal collisions of equivalent or lower severity to the standard 48 km/h frontal barrier test is defined with reference to recent accident data. Performance of current systems in actual collisions and in the frontal barrier test is compared. It is concluded that requiring all occupant restraint systems to meet the alternative set of performance criteria, recently proposed by Transport Canada for automatic seat belts, would significantly improve their performance. Requiring only the use of available technology, the primary effect of those criteria would be virtually to preclude injurious head and facial contacts with the vehicle interior in collisions of the regulated collision severity. Objective methods of defining seat belt fit are still required, in particular to reduce the incidence of belt-induced abdominal injury. (A) For the covering abstract of the conference see IRRD 864606.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper restates the principles that underlie Transport Canada's policy on occupant restraints. Those principles require both improvements in the protection of the individual occupant and increases in benefits to society through the more general use of restraint systems. Progress in seat belt use in Canada is summarized. The effectiveness of current three-point seat belts in preventing fatalities in frontal collisions is briefly reviewed. The residual injury problem in frontal collisions of equivalent or lower severity to the standard 48 km/h frontal barrier test is defined with reference to recent accident data. Performance of current systems in actual collisions and in the frontal barrier test is compared. It is concluded that requiring all occupant restraint systems to meet the alternative set of performance criteria, recently proposed by Transport Canada for automatic seat belts, would significantly improve their performance. Requiring only the use of available technology, the primary effect of those criteria would be virtually to preclude injurious head and facial contacts with the vehicle interior in collisions of the regulated collision severity. Objective methods of defining seat belt fit are still required, in particular to reduce the incidence of belt-induced abdominal injury. (A) For the covering abstract of the conference see IRRD 864606.

Key concepts: Seat belt, Collision, Poison control, Residual, Engineering, Aeronautics, Forensic engineering, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
IMPROVING THE PROTECTION OF RESTRAINED FRONT SEAT OCCUPANTS IN FRONTAL CRASHES — Research Paper | ScholarLens