2015The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Interaural time and level interaction under free-field conditions

Brad Rakerd, Eric J. Macaulay, William M. Hartmann

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Listeners judged the azimuthal location of sine tones presented in free field from an array of 25 small loudspeakers uniformly spaced over 180 degrees in the forward half of the horizontal plane. Probe microphones in the listener's ear canals recorded the tones, and transaural synthesis was used to reverse the interaural time difference (ITD) or the interaural level difference (ILD) across the mid-sagittal plane. Alternatively, the synthesis maintained the natural, consistent ITD and ILD. In the frequency range of 1000 Hz and below, localization judgments reflected the ITD, even as the interaural phase difference (IPD) surpassed 180 degrees with increasing azimuth or frequency, as long as the ILD and ITD had the same sign. In the reversed condition, and with small IPD, judgments reflected a compromise between ITD and ILD, with the ILD weight increasing with increasing frequency. But when the IPD exceeded a critical angle (about 120 degrees of phase) the influence of the ITD dramatically changed: Above 500 Hz, the localization judgments were consistent with ITD from a slipped cycle. At 500 Hz, judgments became chaotic. No critical angle occurred at 250 Hz. These conclusions are relevant in assessing the roles of interaural differences in sound localization. [Work supported by the AFOSR.]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Listeners judged the azimuthal location of sine tones presented in free field from an array of 25 small loudspeakers uniformly spaced over 180 degrees in the forward half of the horizontal plane. Probe microphones in the listener's ear canals recorded the tones, and transaural synthesis was used to reverse the interaural time difference (ITD) or the interaural level difference (ILD) across the mid-sagittal plane. Alternatively, the synthesis maintained the natural, consistent ITD and ILD. In the frequency range of 1000 Hz and below, localization judgments reflected the ITD, even as the interaural phase difference (IPD) surpassed 180 degrees with increasing azimuth or frequency, as long as the ILD and ITD had the same sign. In the reversed condition, and with small IPD, judgments reflected a compromise between ITD and ILD, with the ILD weight increasing with increasing frequency. But when the IPD exceeded a critical angle (about 120 degrees of phase) the influence of the ITD dramatically changed: Above 500 Hz, the localization judgments were consistent with ITD from a slipped cycle. At 500 Hz, judgments became chaotic. No critical angle occurred at 250 Hz. These conclusions are relevant in assessing the roles of interaural differences in sound localization. [Work supported by the AFOSR.]

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Listeners judged the azimuthal location of sine tones presented in free field from an array of 25 small loudspeakers uniformly spaced over 180 degrees in the forward half of the horizontal plane. Probe microphones in the listener's ear canals recorded the tones, and transaural synthesis was used to reverse the interaural time difference (ITD) or the interaural level difference (ILD) across the mid-sagittal plane. Alternatively, the synthesis maintained the natural, consistent ITD and ILD. In the frequency range of 1000 Hz and below, localization judgments reflected the ITD, even as the interaural phase difference (IPD) surpassed 180 degrees with increasing azimuth or frequency, as long as the ILD and ITD had the same sign. In the reversed condition, and with small IPD, judgments reflected a compromise between ITD and ILD, with the ILD weight increasing with increasing frequency. But when the IPD exceeded a critical angle (about 120 degrees of phase) the influence of the ITD dramatically changed: Above 500 Hz, the localization judgments were consistent with ITD from a slipped cycle. At 500 Hz, judgments became chaotic. No critical angle occurred at 250 Hz. These conclusions are relevant in assessing the roles of interaural differences in sound localization. [Work supported by the AFOSR.]

Key concepts: Interaural time difference, Azimuth, Horizontal plane, Acoustics, Sound localization, Loudspeaker, Median plane, Phase difference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interaural time and level interaction under free-field conditions — Research Paper | ScholarLens