2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Segmenting destinations: In the eyes of the stakeholders

Aaron Tkaczynski, Sharyn Rundle‐Thiele

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to recommend a two‐step approach to destination segmentation that incorporates the views both of multiple stakeholders and of tourists.Design/methodology/approach – Step one applies a case study approach incorporating semi‐structured interviews with 13 destination stakeholders. Step two involves segmenting tourists to the destination based on a questionnaire survey developed from the semi‐structured interviews. The study compares and contrasts the result with the current DMO approach.Findings – The two‐step approach produces three segments for the destination under study using four segmentation bases and ten variables. The DMO approach also utilizes all four segmentation bases but produces six segments with five different variables. The DMO approach captures fewer tourists visiting the destination.Research limitations/implications – This study considers one regional Australian destination. Future research is recommended in a range of alternative destinations to further understand...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose – This paper aims to recommend a two‐step approach to destination segmentation that incorporates the views both of multiple stakeholders and of tourists.Design/methodology/approach – Step one applies a case study approach incorporating semi‐structured interviews with 13 destination stakeholders. Step two involves segmenting tourists to the destination based on a questionnaire survey developed from the semi‐structured interviews. The study compares and contrasts the result with the current DMO approach.Findings – The two‐step approach produces three segments for the destination under study using four segmentation bases and ten variables. The DMO approach also utilizes all four segmentation bases but produces six segments with five different variables. The DMO approach captures fewer tourists visiting the destination.Research limitations/implications – This study considers one regional Australian destination. Future research is recommended in a range of alternative destinations to further understand...

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to recommend a two‐step approach to destination segmentation that incorporates the views both of multiple stakeholders and of tourists.Design/methodology/approach – Step one applies a case study approach incorporating semi‐structured interviews with 13 destination stakeholders. Step two involves segmenting tourists to the destination based on a questionnaire survey developed from the semi‐structured interviews. The study compares and contrasts the result with the current DMO approach.Findings – The two‐step approach produces three segments for the destination under study using four segmentation bases and ten variables. The DMO approach also utilizes all four segmentation bases but produces six segments with five different variables. The DMO approach captures fewer tourists visiting the destination.Research limitations/implications – This study considers one regional Australian destination. Future research is recommended in a range of alternative destinations to further understand...

Key concepts: Market segmentation, Destinations, Segmentation, Marketing, Tourism, Computer science, Advertising, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Segmenting destinations: In the eyes of the stakeholders — Research Paper | ScholarLens