1980Journal of applied meteorologyRequires access

Comparison of Results Obtained with the VIDIAZ Spectropluviometer and the Joss-Waldvogel Rainfall Disdrometer in a “Rain of a Thundery Type”

G. Donnadieu

Open publisher page 40 citations

Abstract

In this paper the mean values of the raindrop size distribution n(D), rainfall rate R, liquid water content W and radar reflectivity Z obtained by two different instruments are compared: a spectropluviometer which measures the diameter and fallspeed of each raindrop, and a Joss-Waldvogel disdrometer which gives the diameter by measurement of the force of the impacting drops on a sensor, assuming that they fall at the terminal velocities in still air obtained by Gunn and Kinzer. For 14 measurements of 1 min each in a rain of a thundery type, it is found that the fallspeeds of raindrops are about 13–1% above the values of Gunn and Kinzer in the range of the measured diameters (0.8–2.8 mm) for the Joss-Waldvogel disdrometer these fallspeed deviations produce a correction of ∼12% on R and 17% on W and Z. Introducing these corrections for the disdrometer and a correction due to the fact that some raindrops were not recorded by the spectropluviometer (and, in addition, taking into account the statistical errors resulting from the natural fluctuations of the rain) R, W and Z a common range of values for these two instruments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper the mean values of the raindrop size distribution n(D), rainfall rate R, liquid water content W and radar reflectivity Z obtained by two different instruments are compared: a spectropluviometer which measures the diameter and fallspeed of each raindrop, and a Joss-Waldvogel disdrometer which gives the diameter by measurement of the force of the impacting drops on a sensor, assuming that they fall at the terminal velocities in still air obtained by Gunn and Kinzer. For 14 measurements of 1 min each in a rain of a thundery type, it is found that the fallspeeds of raindrops are about 13–1% above the values of Gunn and Kinzer in the range of the measured diameters (0.8–2.8 mm) for the Joss-Waldvogel disdrometer these fallspeed deviations produce a correction of ∼12% on R and 17% on W and Z. Introducing these corrections for the disdrometer and a correction due to the fact that some raindrops were not recorded by the spectropluviometer (and, in addition, taking into account the statistical errors resulting from the natural fluctuations of the rain) R, W and Z a common range of values for these two instruments.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper the mean values of the raindrop size distribution n(D), rainfall rate R, liquid water content W and radar reflectivity Z obtained by two different instruments are compared: a spectropluviometer which measures the diameter and fallspeed of each raindrop, and a Joss-Waldvogel disdrometer which gives the diameter by measurement of the force of the impacting drops on a sensor, assuming that they fall at the terminal velocities in still air obtained by Gunn and Kinzer. For 14 measurements of 1 min each in a rain of a thundery type, it is found that the fallspeeds of raindrops are about 13–1% above the values of Gunn and Kinzer in the range of the measured diameters (0.8–2.8 mm) for the Joss-Waldvogel disdrometer these fallspeed deviations produce a correction of ∼12% on R and 17% on W and Z. Introducing these corrections for the disdrometer and a correction due to the fact that some raindrops were not recorded by the spectropluviometer (and, in addition, taking into account the statistical errors resulting from the natural fluctuations of the rain) R, W and Z a common range of values for these two instruments.

Key concepts: Disdrometer, Range (aeronautics), Splash, Meteorology, Physics, Environmental science, Rain rate, Atmospheric sciences

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Results Obtained with the VIDIAZ Spectropluviometer and the Joss-Waldvogel Rainfall Disdrometer in a “Rain of a Thundery Type” — Research Paper | ScholarLens