Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in Criminal Proceedings: Interpreting Ne Bis in Idem in Conjunction with the Principle of Complementarity
Ger Coffey
Abstract
Ger Coffey
Abstract
The manner of establishing criminal jurisdiction by domestic courts of competent criminal jurisdiction presents the most important aspect of the relation between states and international tribunals. The analyses of the jurisprudence of international courts and tribunals pertaining to the principle ne bis in idem has resulted in the conclusion that this principle can be fully understood and applied in conjunction with the principle of complementarity.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The manner of establishing criminal jurisdiction by domestic courts of competent criminal jurisdiction presents the most important aspect of the relation between states and international tribunals. The analyses of the jurisprudence of international courts and tribunals pertaining to the principle ne bis in idem has resulted in the conclusion that this principle can be fully understood and applied in conjunction with the principle of complementarity.
Key concepts: Complementarity (molecular biology), Jurisdiction, Criminal jurisdiction, Conjunction (astronomy), Jurisprudence, Law, Political science, Criminal law