1990•Community Junior College Research Quarterly of Research and PracticeRequires access

FUNDING COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACTIVITIES: A SENATE AND PRESIDENTIAL COMPARISON

Phyllis C. Ashworth, Daniel E. Vogler

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Members of the Virginia Senate and Virginia Community College presidents were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the importance of state funding for 31 potential community college activities. The responses of the groups were compared to identify areas of agreement and disagreement and to determine if congruence existed between the priorities for state funding of the activities. Although there was disagreement on some of the activities, both senators and presidents agreed that most should receive state funding. Furthermore, there was a high degree of congruence between priorities. Such agreement indicates good communication between community college leaders and state elected officials.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Members of the Virginia Senate and Virginia Community College presidents were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the importance of state funding for 31 potential community college activities. The responses of the groups were compared to identify areas of agreement and disagreement and to determine if congruence existed between the priorities for state funding of the activities. Although there was disagreement on some of the activities, both senators and presidents agreed that most should receive state funding. Furthermore, there was a high degree of congruence between priorities. Such agreement indicates good communication between community college leaders and state elected officials.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Members of the Virginia Senate and Virginia Community College presidents were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the importance of state funding for 31 potential community college activities. The responses of the groups were compared to identify areas of agreement and disagreement and to determine if congruence existed between the priorities for state funding of the activities. Although there was disagreement on some of the activities, both senators and presidents agreed that most should receive state funding. Furthermore, there was a high degree of congruence between priorities. Such agreement indicates good communication between community college leaders and state elected officials.

Key concepts: Presidential system, Community college, State (computer science), Public administration, Political science, Congruence (geometry), Public relations, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
FUNDING COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACTIVITIES: A SENATE AND PRESIDENTIAL COMPARISON — Research Paper | ScholarLens