2002Journal of ClimateOpen access

A Test for Annular Modes

Judah Cohen, Kazuyuki Saitô

Open full text 21 citations

Abstract

The use of empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs) has grown popular as a tool to determine underlying variability from the rapidly increasing volume of climate data. It has been noted that the dominant or first EOF of geopotential heights, in each hemisphere at levels from the surface through the troposphere and into the midstratosphere, appears to be zonally symmetric. It has also been suggested that all of the first EOFs, throughout the atmospheric column are barotropically coupled and annular. Moreover, such modes of variability in both hemispheres are thought to be analogous to each other. To define annularity more objectively and to facilitate comparisons both temporally and spatially, a framework has been formulated within which modes of variability may be tested for their degree of zonal symmetry or annularity. Motivated by previous choices, pressure–height fields in each hemisphere are tested for annularity, one near the surface and the other in the midstratosphere. Periods chosen coincide with times when the troposphere and stratosphere are actively coupled. According to the test for annularity on the first mode of variability, these fields can be ranked in order of degree of annularity: the first EOF of Northern Hemisphere (NH) December–January–February (DJF) 50-hPa geopotential height is annular; the first EOF of Southern Hemisphere November 50-hPa geopotential height is weakly annular; the first EOF of Southern Hemisphere November 850-hPa geopotential height is weakly nonannular; and the first EOF of NH DJF sea level pressure is nonannular.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The use of empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs) has grown popular as a tool to determine underlying variability from the rapidly increasing volume of climate data. It has been noted that the dominant or first EOF of geopotential heights, in each hemisphere at levels from the surface through the troposphere and into the midstratosphere, appears to be zonally symmetric. It has also been suggested that all of the first EOFs, throughout the atmospheric column are barotropically coupled and annular. Moreover, such modes of variability in both hemispheres are thought to be analogous to each other. To define annularity more objectively and to facilitate comparisons both temporally and spatially, a framework has been formulated within which modes of variability may be tested for their degree of zonal symmetry or annularity. Motivated by previous choices, pressure–height fields in each hemisphere are tested for annularity, one near the surface and the other in the midstratosphere. Periods chosen coincide with times when the troposphere and stratosphere are actively coupled. According to the test for annularity on the first mode of variability, these fields can be ranked in order of degree of annularity: the first EOF of Northern Hemisphere (NH) December–January–February (DJF) 50-hPa geopotential height is annular; the first EOF of Southern Hemisphere November 50-hPa geopotential height is weakly annular; the first EOF of Southern Hemisphere November 850-hPa geopotential height is weakly nonannular; and the first EOF of NH DJF sea level pressure is nonannular.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The use of empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs) has grown popular as a tool to determine underlying variability from the rapidly increasing volume of climate data. It has been noted that the dominant or first EOF of geopotential heights, in each hemisphere at levels from the surface through the troposphere and into the midstratosphere, appears to be zonally symmetric. It has also been suggested that all of the first EOFs, throughout the atmospheric column are barotropically coupled and annular. Moreover, such modes of variability in both hemispheres are thought to be analogous to each other. To define annularity more objectively and to facilitate comparisons both temporally and spatially, a framework has been formulated within which modes of variability may be tested for their degree of zonal symmetry or annularity. Motivated by previous choices, pressure–height fields in each hemisphere are tested for annularity, one near the surface and the other in the midstratosphere. Periods chosen coincide with times when the troposphere and stratosphere are actively coupled. According to the test for annularity on the first mode of variability, these fields can be ranked in order of degree of annularity: the first EOF of Northern Hemisphere (NH) December–January–February (DJF) 50-hPa geopotential height is annular; the first EOF of Southern Hemisphere November 50-hPa geopotential height is weakly annular; the first EOF of Southern Hemisphere November 850-hPa geopotential height is weakly nonannular; and the first EOF of NH DJF sea level pressure is nonannular.

Key concepts: Geopotential height, Empirical orthogonal functions, Geopotential, Northern Hemisphere, Climatology, Troposphere, Southern Hemisphere, Stratosphere

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Test for Annular Modes — Research Paper | ScholarLens