2015Journal of Ultrasound in MedicineRequires access

Application of Contrast‐Enhanced Sonography for Diagnosis of Space‐Occupying Lesions in the Extrahepatic Bile Duct

Wei Wu, Yue Cong, Zhongyi Zhang, Wei Yang, Shanshan Yin, Zhihui Fan, Ying Dai, Kun Yan, Minhua Chen

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the application of contrast-enhanced sonography compared with conventional sonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis of space-occupying lesions in the extrahepatic bile duct. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with pathologic diagnoses of space-occupying lesions in the extrahepatic bile duct were retrospectively recruited. All patients underwent conventional sonography, contrast-enhanced sonography, and contrast-enhanced CT. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were compared. RESULTS: Among the 72 patients, 11 cases were benign, and 61 were malignant. The diagnostic accuracy rates for conventional sonography, contrast-enhanced sonography, and contrast-enhanced CT were 66.67% (48 of 72), 90.28% (65 of 72), and 88.89% (64 of 72), respectively. The Youden index showed that contrast-enhanced sonography (0.811) was comparable with contrast-enhanced CT (0.720) and better than conventional sonography (0.159). There were significant differences in accuracy between conventional and contrast-enhanced sonography (P= .001) and conventional sonography and contrast-enhanced CT (P = .001); however, there was no significant difference between contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT (P = .785). There were significant differences in sensitivity between conventional and contrast-enhanced sonography (P= .006) and conventional sonography and contrast-enhanced CT (P = .006) but no significant difference between contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT (P > .99). There were no significant differences in specificity among the techniques (P > .05). There was a significant difference in the number of lesions with clear boundaries displayed: 16 on conventional sonography and 56 on contrast-enhanced sonography (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced sonography can show the dynamic blood supply in space-occupying pathologic regions of the extrahepatic bile duct. The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced sonography in the extrahepatic bile duct was higher than that of conventional sonography and comparable with that of contrast-enhanced CT. Therefore, contrast-enhanced sonography may be a promising imaging technique for diagnosis of space-occupying lesions in the extrahepatic bile duct.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the application of contrast-enhanced sonography compared with conventional sonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis of space-occupying lesions in the extrahepatic bile duct. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with pathologic diagnoses of space-occupying lesions in the extrahepatic bile duct were retrospectively recruited. All patients underwent conventional sonography, contrast-enhanced sonography, and contrast-enhanced CT. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were compared. RESULTS: Among the 72 patients, 11 cases were benign, and 61 were malignant. The diagnostic accuracy rates for conventional sonography, contrast-enhanced sonography, and contrast-enhanced CT were 66.67% (48 of 72), 90.28% (65 of 72), and 88.89% (64 of 72), respectively. The Youden index showed that contrast-enhanced sonography (0.811) was comparable with contrast-enhanced CT (0.720) and better than conventional sonography (0.159). There were significant differences in accuracy between conventional and contrast-enhanced sonography (P= .001) and conventional sonography and contrast-enhanced CT (P = .001); however, there was no significant difference between contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT (P = .785). There were significant differences in sensitivity between conventional and contrast-enhanced sonography (P= .006) and conventional sonography and contrast-enhanced CT (P = .006) but no significant difference between contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT (P > .99). There were no significant differences in specificity among the techniques (P > .05). There was a significant difference in the number of lesions with clear boundaries displayed: 16 on conventional sonography and 56 on contrast-enhanced sonography (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced sonography can show the dynamic blood supply in space-occupying pathologic regions of the extrahepatic bile duct. The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced sonography in the extrahepatic bile duct was higher than that of conventional sonography and comparable with that of contrast-enhanced CT. Therefore, contrast-enhanced sonography may be a promising imaging technique for diagnosis of space-occupying lesions in the extrahepatic bile duct.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the application of contrast-enhanced sonography compared with conventional sonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis of space-occupying lesions in the extrahepatic bile duct. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with pathologic diagnoses of space-occupying lesions in the extrahepatic bile duct were retrospectively recruited. All patients underwent conventional sonography, contrast-enhanced sonography, and contrast-enhanced CT. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were compared. RESULTS: Among the 72 patients, 11 cases were benign, and 61 were malignant. The diagnostic accuracy rates for conventional sonography, contrast-enhanced sonography, and contrast-enhanced CT were 66.67% (48 of 72), 90.28% (65 of 72), and 88.89% (64 of 72), respectively. The Youden index showed that contrast-enhanced sonography (0.811) was comparable with contrast-enhanced CT (0.720) and better than conventional sonography (0.159). There were significant differences in accuracy between conventional and contrast-enhanced sonography (P= .001) and conventional sonography and contrast-enhanced CT (P = .001); however, there was no significant difference between contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT (P = .785). There were significant differences in sensitivity between conventional and contrast-enhanced sonography (P= .006) and conventional sonography and contrast-enhanced CT (P = .006) but no significant difference between contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT (P > .99). There were no significant differences in specificity among the techniques (P > .05). There was a significant difference in the number of lesions with clear boundaries displayed: 16 on conventional sonography and 56 on contrast-enhanced sonography (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced sonography can show the dynamic blood supply in space-occupying pathologic regions of the extrahepatic bile duct. The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced sonography in the extrahepatic bile duct was higher than that of conventional sonography and comparable with that of contrast-enhanced CT. Therefore, contrast-enhanced sonography may be a promising imaging technique for diagnosis of space-occupying lesions in the extrahepatic bile duct.

Key concepts: Medicine, Contrast (vision), Radiology, Significant difference, Bile duct, Contrast enhancement, Nuclear medicine, Magnetic resonance imaging

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application of Contrast‐Enhanced Sonography for Diagnosis of Space‐Occupying Lesions in the Extrahepatic Bile Duct — Research Paper | ScholarLens