2009•Volume 6: ASME Power Transmission and Gearing Conference; 3rd International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems; 11th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle and Tire TechnologiesRequires access

Transmission Error as Gear Noise Excitation

Mats Henriksson, Yuet-Yan Pang

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Traditionally, transmission error (TE) has been used in order to asses the noise properties of gears. Measurements of gear noise for a complete truck gearbox have been used to correlate noise from a gear pair with the concept of calculated static transmission error as noise excitation. Two gear pairs with very similar macro geometry but different micro geometry was used. Both transmission error as excitation and the excitation proposed by P. Velex and M. Ajmi which is the difference between the loaded and unloaded transmission error, are compared with measured noise. The result shows that the difference between the loaded and unloaded TE correlates well with measure noise for gear pair A but no excitation correlates with the measurement result gear pair B. A big difference between gear pair A and B can be seen in the contact pattern. The contact pattern of gear pair B shows that despite a large tip relief, edge contact occurs where the tip relief starts. This can be one explanation to the lack of correlation between TE and the measurement result for gear pair B. Another explanation can be other excitations such as friction and bending moments. The results show the limitations of only considering transmission error when designing quiet gears.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Traditionally, transmission error (TE) has been used in order to asses the noise properties of gears. Measurements of gear noise for a complete truck gearbox have been used to correlate noise from a gear pair with the concept of calculated static transmission error as noise excitation. Two gear pairs with very similar macro geometry but different micro geometry was used. Both transmission error as excitation and the excitation proposed by P. Velex and M. Ajmi which is the difference between the loaded and unloaded transmission error, are compared with measured noise. The result shows that the difference between the loaded and unloaded TE correlates well with measure noise for gear pair A but no excitation correlates with the measurement result gear pair B. A big difference between gear pair A and B can be seen in the contact pattern. The contact pattern of gear pair B shows that despite a large tip relief, edge contact occurs where the tip relief starts. This can be one explanation to the lack of correlation between TE and the measurement result for gear pair B. Another explanation can be other excitations such as friction and bending moments. The results show the limitations of only considering transmission error when designing quiet gears.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Traditionally, transmission error (TE) has been used in order to asses the noise properties of gears. Measurements of gear noise for a complete truck gearbox have been used to correlate noise from a gear pair with the concept of calculated static transmission error as noise excitation. Two gear pairs with very similar macro geometry but different micro geometry was used. Both transmission error as excitation and the excitation proposed by P. Velex and M. Ajmi which is the difference between the loaded and unloaded transmission error, are compared with measured noise. The result shows that the difference between the loaded and unloaded TE correlates well with measure noise for gear pair A but no excitation correlates with the measurement result gear pair B. A big difference between gear pair A and B can be seen in the contact pattern. The contact pattern of gear pair B shows that despite a large tip relief, edge contact occurs where the tip relief starts. This can be one explanation to the lack of correlation between TE and the measurement result for gear pair B. Another explanation can be other excitations such as friction and bending moments. The results show the limitations of only considering transmission error when designing quiet gears.

Key concepts: Noise (video), Excitation, Transmission (telecommunications), Acoustics, Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution, Physics, Engineering, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transmission Error as Gear Noise Excitation — Research Paper | ScholarLens