2011Unpublished venueRequires access

Bayesian and classical estimation of mixed logit model for simulated experimental data

Lijun Yu, Lei‐Yun Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the similarities and differences between classical maximum Simulated Likelihood and Bayesian methods in estimating parameters of mixed logit model. We use the simulated dataset to numerically evaluate the performance of the two methods. Our results show that two methods provide close estimates in our study; both methods are fairly straightforward to implement. We also find that classical approach is faster than Bayesian method and Bayesian method can be sensitive to given parameters. The results suggest that the choice between the two estimation approaches depends more on researcher's preference.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper explores the similarities and differences between classical maximum Simulated Likelihood and Bayesian methods in estimating parameters of mixed logit model. We use the simulated dataset to numerically evaluate the performance of the two methods. Our results show that two methods provide close estimates in our study; both methods are fairly straightforward to implement. We also find that classical approach is faster than Bayesian method and Bayesian method can be sensitive to given parameters. The results suggest that the choice between the two estimation approaches depends more on researcher's preference.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper explores the similarities and differences between classical maximum Simulated Likelihood and Bayesian methods in estimating parameters of mixed logit model. We use the simulated dataset to numerically evaluate the performance of the two methods. Our results show that two methods provide close estimates in our study; both methods are fairly straightforward to implement. We also find that classical approach is faster than Bayesian method and Bayesian method can be sensitive to given parameters. The results suggest that the choice between the two estimation approaches depends more on researcher's preference.

Key concepts: Mixed logit, Bayesian probability, Logit, Computer science, Estimation, Logistic regression, Bayes estimator, Maximum likelihood

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bayesian and classical estimation of mixed logit model for simulated experimental data — Research Paper | ScholarLens