2005Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular BiologyOpen access

Endothelial EphrinB2 Is Controlled by Microenvironmental Determinants and Associates Context-Dependently With CD31

Thomas Korff, Gudrun Dandekar, Dennis Pfaff, Tim Füller, Winfried Göettsch, Henning Morawietz, Florence Schaffner, Hellmut G. Augustin

Open full text 52 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The EphB ligand ephrinB2 has been identified as a critical determinant of arterial endothelial differentiation and as a positive regulator of invading endothelial cells during angiogenesis. This study was aimed at identifying determinants of endothelial cell ephrinB2 expression. METHODS AND RESULTS: Arteriovenous asymmetrical endothelial cell ephrinB2 expression in vivo is lost on transfer into culture with aortic endothelial cells becoming partially ephrinB2-negative and saphenous vein endothelial cells becoming partially ephrinB2-positive. Contact with smooth muscle cells and angiogenic stimulation by vascular endothelial growth factor lead to an increased endothelial cell ephrinB2 expression. Quiescent, smooth muscle-contacting endothelial cells express ephrinB2 uniformly on their luminal surface. In contrast, monolayer endothelial cells translocate ephrinB2 to interendothelial cell junctions, which is strongly enhanced by EphB4-Fc-mediated receptor body activation. Junctional ephrinB2 colocalizes and coimmunoprecipitates with CD31. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies distinct regulatory mechanisms of endothelial ephrinB2 expression and cellular distribution in quiescent and activated endothelial cells. The data demonstrate that endothelial cell ephrinB2 expression is controlled by microenvironmental determinants rather than being an intrinsic endothelial cell differentiation marker.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: The EphB ligand ephrinB2 has been identified as a critical determinant of arterial endothelial differentiation and as a positive regulator of invading endothelial cells during angiogenesis. This study was aimed at identifying determinants of endothelial cell ephrinB2 expression. METHODS AND RESULTS: Arteriovenous asymmetrical endothelial cell ephrinB2 expression in vivo is lost on transfer into culture with aortic endothelial cells becoming partially ephrinB2-negative and saphenous vein endothelial cells becoming partially ephrinB2-positive. Contact with smooth muscle cells and angiogenic stimulation by vascular endothelial growth factor lead to an increased endothelial cell ephrinB2 expression. Quiescent, smooth muscle-contacting endothelial cells express ephrinB2 uniformly on their luminal surface. In contrast, monolayer endothelial cells translocate ephrinB2 to interendothelial cell junctions, which is strongly enhanced by EphB4-Fc-mediated receptor body activation. Junctional ephrinB2 colocalizes and coimmunoprecipitates with CD31. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies distinct regulatory mechanisms of endothelial ephrinB2 expression and cellular distribution in quiescent and activated endothelial cells. The data demonstrate that endothelial cell ephrinB2 expression is controlled by microenvironmental determinants rather than being an intrinsic endothelial cell differentiation marker.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 52 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: The EphB ligand ephrinB2 has been identified as a critical determinant of arterial endothelial differentiation and as a positive regulator of invading endothelial cells during angiogenesis. This study was aimed at identifying determinants of endothelial cell ephrinB2 expression. METHODS AND RESULTS: Arteriovenous asymmetrical endothelial cell ephrinB2 expression in vivo is lost on transfer into culture with aortic endothelial cells becoming partially ephrinB2-negative and saphenous vein endothelial cells becoming partially ephrinB2-positive. Contact with smooth muscle cells and angiogenic stimulation by vascular endothelial growth factor lead to an increased endothelial cell ephrinB2 expression. Quiescent, smooth muscle-contacting endothelial cells express ephrinB2 uniformly on their luminal surface. In contrast, monolayer endothelial cells translocate ephrinB2 to interendothelial cell junctions, which is strongly enhanced by EphB4-Fc-mediated receptor body activation. Junctional ephrinB2 colocalizes and coimmunoprecipitates with CD31. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies distinct regulatory mechanisms of endothelial ephrinB2 expression and cellular distribution in quiescent and activated endothelial cells. The data demonstrate that endothelial cell ephrinB2 expression is controlled by microenvironmental determinants rather than being an intrinsic endothelial cell differentiation marker.

Key concepts: CD31, Endothelial stem cell, Cell biology, Angiogenesis, Biology, Vascular endothelial growth factor B, Vascular endothelial growth factor C, Cell

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Endothelial EphrinB2 Is Controlled by Microenvironmental Determinants and Associates Context-Dependently With CD31 — Research Paper | ScholarLens