2014OtolaryngologyRequires access

Effects of Type 2 Diabetes on Otoacoustic Emissions and the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex

Erdem Eren, Ece Harman, Seçil Arslanoğlu, Kazım Önal

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate if cochleopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes with normal audiometric hearing threshold can be detected with otoacoustic emissions or medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary university teaching hospital. METHODS: The study involved 40 type 2 diabetic patients and 24 healthy volunteers. All participants who showed normal otoscopic findings, hearing thresholds, and acoustic admittance were included. Cochlear activity of participants was evaluated by means of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and transient otoacoustic emissions (TOAEs). The MOC reflex was evoked with contralateral acoustic stimulation and recorded with DPOAEs and TOAEs. RESULT: A comparison of DPOAE and TOAE levels with a t test between patient and control groups revealed no significant difference (P > .05). A comparison of the MOC reflex response between the 2 groups also revealed no statistically significant difference (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Although decreased OAE amplitude levels were found in diabetic patients, there was no statistically significant difference in OAEs and MOC reflex. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the role of OAEs and MOC reflex in normal-hearing patients with diabetes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate if cochleopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes with normal audiometric hearing threshold can be detected with otoacoustic emissions or medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary university teaching hospital. METHODS: The study involved 40 type 2 diabetic patients and 24 healthy volunteers. All participants who showed normal otoscopic findings, hearing thresholds, and acoustic admittance were included. Cochlear activity of participants was evaluated by means of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and transient otoacoustic emissions (TOAEs). The MOC reflex was evoked with contralateral acoustic stimulation and recorded with DPOAEs and TOAEs. RESULT: A comparison of DPOAE and TOAE levels with a t test between patient and control groups revealed no significant difference (P > .05). A comparison of the MOC reflex response between the 2 groups also revealed no statistically significant difference (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Although decreased OAE amplitude levels were found in diabetic patients, there was no statistically significant difference in OAEs and MOC reflex. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the role of OAEs and MOC reflex in normal-hearing patients with diabetes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate if cochleopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes with normal audiometric hearing threshold can be detected with otoacoustic emissions or medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary university teaching hospital. METHODS: The study involved 40 type 2 diabetic patients and 24 healthy volunteers. All participants who showed normal otoscopic findings, hearing thresholds, and acoustic admittance were included. Cochlear activity of participants was evaluated by means of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and transient otoacoustic emissions (TOAEs). The MOC reflex was evoked with contralateral acoustic stimulation and recorded with DPOAEs and TOAEs. RESULT: A comparison of DPOAE and TOAE levels with a t test between patient and control groups revealed no significant difference (P > .05). A comparison of the MOC reflex response between the 2 groups also revealed no statistically significant difference (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Although decreased OAE amplitude levels were found in diabetic patients, there was no statistically significant difference in OAEs and MOC reflex. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the role of OAEs and MOC reflex in normal-hearing patients with diabetes.

Key concepts: Acoustic reflex, Audiology, Otoacoustic emission, Medicine, Reflex, Significant difference, Diabetes mellitus, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of Type 2 Diabetes on Otoacoustic Emissions and the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex — Research Paper | ScholarLens