2000•Journal of Ultrasound in MedicineRequires access

Intrauterine growth restriction and Doppler ultrasonography.

William J. Ott

Open publisher page 59 citations

Abstract

To clarify the difference between the fetus that is small for gestational age and the fetus with true intrauterine growth restriction, we undertook a retrospective study of singleton fetuses who had fetal weight estimation and umbilical artery Doppler velocity studies within 2 weeks of their delivery. Fetuses were divided into four categories on the basis of sonographic results from their last examination. Statistical comparisons of neonatal outcome were made for the four groups, which totaled 578 fetuses. Increased cesarean section for fetal distress, stays in the neonatal intensive care unit, and increased neonatal morbidity were seen in both small for gestational age and average for gestational age neonates with abnormal Doppler blood flow. The small for gestational age fetuses with normal Doppler studies showed no increased morbidity when compared with their average for gestational age cohorts. Umbilical artery Doppler blood flow studies were a better predictor of neonatal outcome than estimated fetal weight. Small for gestational age fetuses with normal Doppler studies most likely represent constitutionally small, not pathologically growth restricted, fetuses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To clarify the difference between the fetus that is small for gestational age and the fetus with true intrauterine growth restriction, we undertook a retrospective study of singleton fetuses who had fetal weight estimation and umbilical artery Doppler velocity studies within 2 weeks of their delivery. Fetuses were divided into four categories on the basis of sonographic results from their last examination. Statistical comparisons of neonatal outcome were made for the four groups, which totaled 578 fetuses. Increased cesarean section for fetal distress, stays in the neonatal intensive care unit, and increased neonatal morbidity were seen in both small for gestational age and average for gestational age neonates with abnormal Doppler blood flow. The small for gestational age fetuses with normal Doppler studies showed no increased morbidity when compared with their average for gestational age cohorts. Umbilical artery Doppler blood flow studies were a better predictor of neonatal outcome than estimated fetal weight. Small for gestational age fetuses with normal Doppler studies most likely represent constitutionally small, not pathologically growth restricted, fetuses.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 59 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To clarify the difference between the fetus that is small for gestational age and the fetus with true intrauterine growth restriction, we undertook a retrospective study of singleton fetuses who had fetal weight estimation and umbilical artery Doppler velocity studies within 2 weeks of their delivery. Fetuses were divided into four categories on the basis of sonographic results from their last examination. Statistical comparisons of neonatal outcome were made for the four groups, which totaled 578 fetuses. Increased cesarean section for fetal distress, stays in the neonatal intensive care unit, and increased neonatal morbidity were seen in both small for gestational age and average for gestational age neonates with abnormal Doppler blood flow. The small for gestational age fetuses with normal Doppler studies showed no increased morbidity when compared with their average for gestational age cohorts. Umbilical artery Doppler blood flow studies were a better predictor of neonatal outcome than estimated fetal weight. Small for gestational age fetuses with normal Doppler studies most likely represent constitutionally small, not pathologically growth restricted, fetuses.

Key concepts: Medicine, Gestational age, Fetus, Obstetrics, Umbilical artery, Intrauterine growth restriction, Small for gestational age, Birth weight

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intrauterine growth restriction and Doppler ultrasonography. — Research Paper | ScholarLens