2009•Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea StudiesRequires access

Russian and European neighbourhood policies compared

Andrew Wilson, Nicu Popescu

Open publisher page 47 citations

Abstract

The European neighbourhood policy (ENP) has been unable to shift the political and security processes in the Eastern neighbourhood of the European Union. This is partly to do with the fact that ENP has been developed as if the EU is the ‘only game in town’ and that its neighbours are keen to adopt the European model, just as Central Europe was in the 1990s. In reality, however, the ENP faces a well‐resourced, albeit informal, Russian neighbourhood policy. Both Russia and the EU have used soft and hard power to achieve their objectives in the neighbourhood, and have often undermined each others’ policies in the region. Improving the effectiveness of the ENP will require more EU commitment to deliver on its promises, as well as an understanding that there can be no stable EU–Russia partnership without greater cooperation, not disengagement, in the shared neighbourhood.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The European neighbourhood policy (ENP) has been unable to shift the political and security processes in the Eastern neighbourhood of the European Union. This is partly to do with the fact that ENP has been developed as if the EU is the ‘only game in town’ and that its neighbours are keen to adopt the European model, just as Central Europe was in the 1990s. In reality, however, the ENP faces a well‐resourced, albeit informal, Russian neighbourhood policy. Both Russia and the EU have used soft and hard power to achieve their objectives in the neighbourhood, and have often undermined each others’ policies in the region. Improving the effectiveness of the ENP will require more EU commitment to deliver on its promises, as well as an understanding that there can be no stable EU–Russia partnership without greater cooperation, not disengagement, in the shared neighbourhood.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The European neighbourhood policy (ENP) has been unable to shift the political and security processes in the Eastern neighbourhood of the European Union. This is partly to do with the fact that ENP has been developed as if the EU is the ‘only game in town’ and that its neighbours are keen to adopt the European model, just as Central Europe was in the 1990s. In reality, however, the ENP faces a well‐resourced, albeit informal, Russian neighbourhood policy. Both Russia and the EU have used soft and hard power to achieve their objectives in the neighbourhood, and have often undermined each others’ policies in the region. Improving the effectiveness of the ENP will require more EU commitment to deliver on its promises, as well as an understanding that there can be no stable EU–Russia partnership without greater cooperation, not disengagement, in the shared neighbourhood.

Key concepts: European Neighbourhood Policy, Neighbourhood (mathematics), European union, Disengagement theory, Politics, Political science, General partnership, Soft power

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Russian and European neighbourhood policies compared — Research Paper | ScholarLens