1999Unpublished venueRequires access

Assessing Biological Effects of Animal Production on Intermittent Coastal Plain Streams

Stephanie N. Davis, Stephen W. Golladay, George Vellidis, Catherine M. Pringle

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Biotic indices increasingly are being used by state and federal agencies to evaluate water quality. The application of existing biotic indices to intermittent Coastal Plain streams is problematic because of unique habitat and flow characteristics. Managers must field-test biotic indices before accepting them for use in this area. This study in South Georgia evaluated the appropriate sampling season for biological monitoring and tested whether existing biotic indices correlated to physical and chemical impacts. Early results showed that index scores changed drastically with season and that different indices yielded conflicting assessments of stream health in intermittent streams of the Coastal Plain. At these sites, the EPT Index (Ephemeroptera/ Plecoptera / Trichoptera) was a better indictor of stream health than the North Carolina Biotic Index because it accurately reflected physical and chemical stream conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract. Biotic indices increasingly are being used by state and federal agencies to evaluate water quality. The application of existing biotic indices to intermittent Coastal Plain streams is problematic because of unique habitat and flow characteristics. Managers must field-test biotic indices before accepting them for use in this area. This study in South Georgia evaluated the appropriate sampling season for biological monitoring and tested whether existing biotic indices correlated to physical and chemical impacts. Early results showed that index scores changed drastically with season and that different indices yielded conflicting assessments of stream health in intermittent streams of the Coastal Plain. At these sites, the EPT Index (Ephemeroptera/ Plecoptera / Trichoptera) was a better indictor of stream health than the North Carolina Biotic Index because it accurately reflected physical and chemical stream conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract. Biotic indices increasingly are being used by state and federal agencies to evaluate water quality. The application of existing biotic indices to intermittent Coastal Plain streams is problematic because of unique habitat and flow characteristics. Managers must field-test biotic indices before accepting them for use in this area. This study in South Georgia evaluated the appropriate sampling season for biological monitoring and tested whether existing biotic indices correlated to physical and chemical impacts. Early results showed that index scores changed drastically with season and that different indices yielded conflicting assessments of stream health in intermittent streams of the Coastal Plain. At these sites, the EPT Index (Ephemeroptera/ Plecoptera / Trichoptera) was a better indictor of stream health than the North Carolina Biotic Index because it accurately reflected physical and chemical stream conditions.

Key concepts: Biotic index, STREAMS, Index of biological integrity, Coastal plain, Environmental science, Habitat, Hydrology (agriculture), Water quality

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessing Biological Effects of Animal Production on Intermittent Coastal Plain Streams — Research Paper | ScholarLens