1982Gamete ResearchRequires access

Detection and kinetics of the normal acrosome reaction of mouse sperm

Elizabeth E. Dudenhausen, Prudence Talbot

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

Abstract A procedure is described for quantifying the percentage of normal acrosome reactions in fixed mouse sperm. This technique, which is a modification of the triple stain technique (TST) devised for human sperm [Talbot and Chacon, 1981a, b], utilizes trypan blue exclusion to identify the percentage of dead sperm in culture and subsequent staining of fixed sperm to differentiate the acrosome. Four classes of mouse sperm can be distinguished with the TST: (1) “live,” unreacted sperm, (2) “live,” acrosome‐reacted sperm (normal reactions), (3) dead, unreacted sperm, and (4) dead, acrosome‐reacted sperm (degenerative acrosome reactions). We have used this technique to study the time course of the normal acrosome reaction of mouse sperm in vitro. Our results with TST show that a low percentage of mouse sperm undergo normal acrosome reactions during the first 30 min of incubation; a maximum level of reactions is reached by 2 hr. Calcium was required in the medium for occurrence of normal reactions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A procedure is described for quantifying the percentage of normal acrosome reactions in fixed mouse sperm. This technique, which is a modification of the triple stain technique (TST) devised for human sperm [Talbot and Chacon, 1981a, b], utilizes trypan blue exclusion to identify the percentage of dead sperm in culture and subsequent staining of fixed sperm to differentiate the acrosome. Four classes of mouse sperm can be distinguished with the TST: (1) “live,” unreacted sperm, (2) “live,” acrosome‐reacted sperm (normal reactions), (3) dead, unreacted sperm, and (4) dead, acrosome‐reacted sperm (degenerative acrosome reactions). We have used this technique to study the time course of the normal acrosome reaction of mouse sperm in vitro. Our results with TST show that a low percentage of mouse sperm undergo normal acrosome reactions during the first 30 min of incubation; a maximum level of reactions is reached by 2 hr. Calcium was required in the medium for occurrence of normal reactions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A procedure is described for quantifying the percentage of normal acrosome reactions in fixed mouse sperm. This technique, which is a modification of the triple stain technique (TST) devised for human sperm [Talbot and Chacon, 1981a, b], utilizes trypan blue exclusion to identify the percentage of dead sperm in culture and subsequent staining of fixed sperm to differentiate the acrosome. Four classes of mouse sperm can be distinguished with the TST: (1) “live,” unreacted sperm, (2) “live,” acrosome‐reacted sperm (normal reactions), (3) dead, unreacted sperm, and (4) dead, acrosome‐reacted sperm (degenerative acrosome reactions). We have used this technique to study the time course of the normal acrosome reaction of mouse sperm in vitro. Our results with TST show that a low percentage of mouse sperm undergo normal acrosome reactions during the first 30 min of incubation; a maximum level of reactions is reached by 2 hr. Calcium was required in the medium for occurrence of normal reactions.

Key concepts: Sperm, Acrosome reaction, Acrosome, Andrology, Trypan blue, Biology, Staining, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Detection and kinetics of the normal acrosome reaction of mouse sperm — Research Paper | ScholarLens