STATISTICAL INFERENCE AT WORK: STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL AS AN EXAMPLE
Arthur Bakker, Phillip Kent, Jan Derry, Richard Noss, Celia Hoyles
Abstract
Open-access reader
Arthur Bakker, Phillip Kent, Jan Derry, Richard Noss, Celia Hoyles
Abstract
Open-access reader
To characterise statistical inference in the workplace this paper compares a prototypical type of statistical inference at work, statistical process control (SPC), with a type of statistical inference that is better known in educational settings, hypothesis testing. Although there are some similarities between the reasoning structure involved in hypothesis testing and SPC that point to key characteristics of statistical inference in general, there are also crucial differences. These come to the fore when we characterise statistical inference within what we call a “space of reasons” – a conglomerate of reasons and implications, evidence and conclusions, causes and effects. First published November 2008 at Statistics Education Research Journal: Archives
OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
To characterise statistical inference in the workplace this paper compares a prototypical type of statistical inference at work, statistical process control (SPC), with a type of statistical inference that is better known in educational settings, hypothesis testing. Although there are some similarities between the reasoning structure involved in hypothesis testing and SPC that point to key characteristics of statistical inference in general, there are also crucial differences. These come to the fore when we characterise statistical inference within what we call a “space of reasons” – a conglomerate of reasons and implications, evidence and conclusions, causes and effects. First published November 2008 at Statistics Education Research Journal: Archives
Key concepts: Statistical inference, Inference, Fiducial inference, Statistical hypothesis testing, Statistical process control, Statistical theory, Frequentist inference, Computer science