1989Headache The Journal of Head and Face PainRequires access

Adverse Reactions to Iopamidol and Iohexol Myelography with Special Attention to Headache: Role of Myelographic Technique

David F. Sobel, Rekarda Rowe, Jack Zyroff, James A. Koziol, Francine Frost, Jean Krupsaw

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

In order to identify those myelographic risk factors associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects, myelographic technique, patient variables and post-myelographic symptoms were prospectively recorded in a group of 152 patients studied with iopamidol and in a second group of 28 patients studied with iohexol. None of the technical factors studied were identified to have a statistically significant relationship with the incidence of adverse reactions. Older patients fared better than younger patients in both groups. Overall, there was a lower incidence of side effects in the iopamidol group (29%) than in the iohexol group (50%). Headache, nausea, and vomiting were the most frequent reactions seen.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to identify those myelographic risk factors associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects, myelographic technique, patient variables and post-myelographic symptoms were prospectively recorded in a group of 152 patients studied with iopamidol and in a second group of 28 patients studied with iohexol. None of the technical factors studied were identified to have a statistically significant relationship with the incidence of adverse reactions. Older patients fared better than younger patients in both groups. Overall, there was a lower incidence of side effects in the iopamidol group (29%) than in the iohexol group (50%). Headache, nausea, and vomiting were the most frequent reactions seen.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to identify those myelographic risk factors associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects, myelographic technique, patient variables and post-myelographic symptoms were prospectively recorded in a group of 152 patients studied with iopamidol and in a second group of 28 patients studied with iohexol. None of the technical factors studied were identified to have a statistically significant relationship with the incidence of adverse reactions. Older patients fared better than younger patients in both groups. Overall, there was a lower incidence of side effects in the iopamidol group (29%) than in the iohexol group (50%). Headache, nausea, and vomiting were the most frequent reactions seen.

Key concepts: Iopamidol, Iohexol, Medicine, Nausea, Myelography, Vomiting, Incidence (geometry), Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Adverse Reactions to Iopamidol and Iohexol Myelography with Special Attention to Headache: Role of Myelographic Technique — Research Paper | ScholarLens