1991British Journal of NeurosurgeryRequires access

Supratentorial masses: Stereotactic or freehand biopsy?

Timothy Lee, B.G. Kenny, Edward R. Hitchock, Peter J. Teddy, Hercules Palividas, William Harkness, Carl H.A. Meyer

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

CT-guided stereotactic biopsy is now an accepted method of tissue sampling in intracranial mass lesions but many surgeons still practise freehand burrhole biopsy. This study compares two groups of patients who had either stereotactically guided (n = 153) or freehand (n = 217) biopsy. Stereotactic biopsy has a lower incidence of both mortality (2.6%) and morbidity (1.3%) than freehand (7.8 and 7.8%) while diagnostic accuracy is 92.1 and 64.9%, respectively. The success rate for stereotactic biopsy is independent of the size and depth of the lesion while freehand biopsy is most successful for large, superficial lesions but its success never exceeds 88%. The stereotactic technique is superior to the freehand for all intracranial biopsies regardless of size or site.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

CT-guided stereotactic biopsy is now an accepted method of tissue sampling in intracranial mass lesions but many surgeons still practise freehand burrhole biopsy. This study compares two groups of patients who had either stereotactically guided (n = 153) or freehand (n = 217) biopsy. Stereotactic biopsy has a lower incidence of both mortality (2.6%) and morbidity (1.3%) than freehand (7.8 and 7.8%) while diagnostic accuracy is 92.1 and 64.9%, respectively. The success rate for stereotactic biopsy is independent of the size and depth of the lesion while freehand biopsy is most successful for large, superficial lesions but its success never exceeds 88%. The stereotactic technique is superior to the freehand for all intracranial biopsies regardless of size or site.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

CT-guided stereotactic biopsy is now an accepted method of tissue sampling in intracranial mass lesions but many surgeons still practise freehand burrhole biopsy. This study compares two groups of patients who had either stereotactically guided (n = 153) or freehand (n = 217) biopsy. Stereotactic biopsy has a lower incidence of both mortality (2.6%) and morbidity (1.3%) than freehand (7.8 and 7.8%) while diagnostic accuracy is 92.1 and 64.9%, respectively. The success rate for stereotactic biopsy is independent of the size and depth of the lesion while freehand biopsy is most successful for large, superficial lesions but its success never exceeds 88%. The stereotactic technique is superior to the freehand for all intracranial biopsies regardless of size or site.

Key concepts: Medicine, Stereotactic biopsy, Biopsy, Radiology, Sampling (signal processing), Lesion, Brain biopsy, Stereotaxy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Supratentorial masses: Stereotactic or freehand biopsy? — Research Paper | ScholarLens