2008Digital Access to LibrariesRequires access

Historical and comparative perspectives on the grammaticalization and subjectification of causal discourse markers

Liesbeth Degand, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul, Benjamin Fagard, Liesbeth Mortier

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction The diachronic development of discourse markers often involves a process of ‘(inter)subjectification’ (cf. Traugott & Dasher 2002; Athanasiado, Canakis & Cornillie 2006), a shift from meanings pertaining to the characterization of the objective world to meanings involving the expression of personal attitudes of the speaker (subjectification) to meanings concerned with the interaction between speaker and hearer (i.e., intersubjectivity). However, it is less obvious that the semantic change of discourse markers also involves a structural type of diachronic change: ‘grammaticalization’ (cf. Onodera 2000; Brinton 2002; Gunthner & Mutz 2006).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction The diachronic development of discourse markers often involves a process of ‘(inter)subjectification’ (cf. Traugott & Dasher 2002; Athanasiado, Canakis & Cornillie 2006), a shift from meanings pertaining to the characterization of the objective world to meanings involving the expression of personal attitudes of the speaker (subjectification) to meanings concerned with the interaction between speaker and hearer (i.e., intersubjectivity). However, it is less obvious that the semantic change of discourse markers also involves a structural type of diachronic change: ‘grammaticalization’ (cf. Onodera 2000; Brinton 2002; Gunthner & Mutz 2006).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction The diachronic development of discourse markers often involves a process of ‘(inter)subjectification’ (cf. Traugott & Dasher 2002; Athanasiado, Canakis & Cornillie 2006), a shift from meanings pertaining to the characterization of the objective world to meanings involving the expression of personal attitudes of the speaker (subjectification) to meanings concerned with the interaction between speaker and hearer (i.e., intersubjectivity). However, it is less obvious that the semantic change of discourse markers also involves a structural type of diachronic change: ‘grammaticalization’ (cf. Onodera 2000; Brinton 2002; Gunthner & Mutz 2006).

Key concepts: Subjectification, Grammaticalization, Linguistics, Semantic change, Expression (computer science), Discourse marker, Intersubjectivity, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Historical and comparative perspectives on the grammaticalization and subjectification of causal discourse markers — Research Paper | ScholarLens