2008中国社会科学:英文版Requires access

Dialectics: Hegel, Marx and post‐metaphysics

Zhengyu Sun

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

在哲学发展史上,黑格尔对抽象理性的批判,实现了辩证法与形而上学的“合流”,并开启了超越形而上学的辩证法的哲学道路。马克思在对抽象理性和抽象存在(资本)的双重批判中,实现了辩证法对形而上学的“终结”,展开了辩证法“对现存的一切进行无情的批判”。在“后形而上学”的视域中“澄清”黑格尔和马克思的辩证法,构建当代人类的实践的辩证法理论,既需要深化对“形而上学的恐怖”的批判,又需要深化对真理—规律—客观性的探索,坚守“反形而上学”的“形上追求”。 In the history of philosophical development, Hegel fulfilled the “convergence” of dialectics and metaphysics and blazed a dialectical philosophical path that transcended metaphysics through his critique of abstract reason. Via critiques of both abstract reason and abstract being (capital), Marx managed to “end” metaphysics with dialectics, and initiated dialectics' “ruthless criticism of everything existing.” To “clarify” the dialectics of Hegel and Marx in a “post‐metaphysical” vision and construct a theory of dialectics of modern human praxis, it is necessary to deepen criticism of “the metaphysical horror” and the exploration of truth‐law‐objectivity, and adhere to “anti‐metaphysical” “metaphysical pursuit.”

About this research paper

What this paper is about

在哲学发展史上,黑格尔对抽象理性的批判,实现了辩证法与形而上学的“合流”,并开启了超越形而上学的辩证法的哲学道路。马克思在对抽象理性和抽象存在(资本)的双重批判中,实现了辩证法对形而上学的“终结”,展开了辩证法“对现存的一切进行无情的批判”。在“后形而上学”的视域中“澄清”黑格尔和马克思的辩证法,构建当代人类的实践的辩证法理论,既需要深化对“形而上学的恐怖”的批判,又需要深化对真理—规律—客观性的探索,坚守“反形而上学”的“形上追求”。 In the history of philosophical development, Hegel fulfilled the “convergence” of dialectics and metaphysics and blazed a dialectical philosophical path that transcended metaphysics through his critique of abstract reason. Via critiques of both abstract reason and abstract being (capital), Marx managed to “end” metaphysics with dialectics, and initiated dialectics' “ruthless criticism of everything existing.” To “clarify” the dialectics of Hegel and Marx in a “post‐metaphysical” vision and construct a theory of dialectics of modern human praxis, it is necessary to deepen criticism of “the metaphysical horror” and the exploration of truth‐law‐objectivity, and adhere to “anti‐metaphysical” “metaphysical pursuit.”

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

在哲学发展史上,黑格尔对抽象理性的批判,实现了辩证法与形而上学的“合流”,并开启了超越形而上学的辩证法的哲学道路。马克思在对抽象理性和抽象存在(资本)的双重批判中,实现了辩证法对形而上学的“终结”,展开了辩证法“对现存的一切进行无情的批判”。在“后形而上学”的视域中“澄清”黑格尔和马克思的辩证法,构建当代人类的实践的辩证法理论,既需要深化对“形而上学的恐怖”的批判,又需要深化对真理—规律—客观性的探索,坚守“反形而上学”的“形上追求”。 In the history of philosophical development, Hegel fulfilled the “convergence” of dialectics and metaphysics and blazed a dialectical philosophical path that transcended metaphysics through his critique of abstract reason. Via critiques of both abstract reason and abstract being (capital), Marx managed to “end” metaphysics with dialectics, and initiated dialectics' “ruthless criticism of everything existing.” To “clarify” the dialectics of Hegel and Marx in a “post‐metaphysical” vision and construct a theory of dialectics of modern human praxis, it is necessary to deepen criticism of “the metaphysical horror” and the exploration of truth‐law‐objectivity, and adhere to “anti‐metaphysical” “metaphysical pursuit.”

Key concepts: Metaphysics, Dialectic, Hegelianism, Philosophy, Epistemology, Criticism, Objectivity (philosophy), Praxis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dialectics: Hegel, Marx and post‐metaphysics — Research Paper | ScholarLens