Hotelling's Location Model in Mixed Duopoly
Yuanzhu Lu
Abstract
Yuanzhu Lu
Abstract
We investigate a mixed duopoly market where a welfare−maximizing public firm competes against a profit−maximizing private firm, using a linear−city location−then−price model with linear transportation costs. We find that, compared with the results in the purely private duopoly case discussed by Hotelling (1929) and d ' Aspremont, Gabszewicz, and Thisse (1979), the condition under which price equilibrium exists for every location of private firm and public firm is changed while the main result of no subgame perfect Nash equilibrium (SPNE) for the game still holds true.
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We investigate a mixed duopoly market where a welfare−maximizing public firm competes against a profit−maximizing private firm, using a linear−city location−then−price model with linear transportation costs. We find that, compared with the results in the purely private duopoly case discussed by Hotelling (1929) and d ' Aspremont, Gabszewicz, and Thisse (1979), the condition under which price equilibrium exists for every location of private firm and public firm is changed while the main result of no subgame perfect Nash equilibrium (SPNE) for the game still holds true.
Key concepts: Duopoly, Subgame perfect equilibrium, Microeconomics, Economics, Nash equilibrium, Profit (economics), Welfare, Subgame