2012Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

Calibration and Validation of Highway Capacity Manual 2010 Capacity Model for Single-Lane Roundabouts

Ting Wei, Jeromy Grenard

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

The 2010 edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010) provides new capacity models for single-lane and multilane roundabouts, which generally predict lower capacity than other popular models previously used in the United States. Acknowledging that both roundabout design practices and the public's use of roundabouts are still maturing in the United States, the HCM recommends local calibration of the capacity models to best reflect local behavior and specifies a calibration procedure that uses two gap acceptance parameters: the critical headway and the follow-up headway. This calibration procedure was used in a case study to develop a calibrated HCM model that was based on driver behavior at three single-lane roundabouts in Carmel, Indiana. Both gap acceptance parameters in Carmel were significantly lower than the default values in the HCM 2010. For validation, the calibrated HCM model was compared with the actual 1-min flow rates collected in the field during the congested periods. The calibrated HCM model was consistent with the field conditions for the low to medium circulating flow rates and overestimates the capacity for the high circulating flow rates. Other findings include the impact of exiting traffic, circulating flow rates, degree of saturation, and amount of the gap acceptance data on the calibration results.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The 2010 edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010) provides new capacity models for single-lane and multilane roundabouts, which generally predict lower capacity than other popular models previously used in the United States. Acknowledging that both roundabout design practices and the public's use of roundabouts are still maturing in the United States, the HCM recommends local calibration of the capacity models to best reflect local behavior and specifies a calibration procedure that uses two gap acceptance parameters: the critical headway and the follow-up headway. This calibration procedure was used in a case study to develop a calibrated HCM model that was based on driver behavior at three single-lane roundabouts in Carmel, Indiana. Both gap acceptance parameters in Carmel were significantly lower than the default values in the HCM 2010. For validation, the calibrated HCM model was compared with the actual 1-min flow rates collected in the field during the congested periods. The calibrated HCM model was consistent with the field conditions for the low to medium circulating flow rates and overestimates the capacity for the high circulating flow rates. Other findings include the impact of exiting traffic, circulating flow rates, degree of saturation, and amount of the gap acceptance data on the calibration results.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The 2010 edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010) provides new capacity models for single-lane and multilane roundabouts, which generally predict lower capacity than other popular models previously used in the United States. Acknowledging that both roundabout design practices and the public's use of roundabouts are still maturing in the United States, the HCM recommends local calibration of the capacity models to best reflect local behavior and specifies a calibration procedure that uses two gap acceptance parameters: the critical headway and the follow-up headway. This calibration procedure was used in a case study to develop a calibrated HCM model that was based on driver behavior at three single-lane roundabouts in Carmel, Indiana. Both gap acceptance parameters in Carmel were significantly lower than the default values in the HCM 2010. For validation, the calibrated HCM model was compared with the actual 1-min flow rates collected in the field during the congested periods. The calibrated HCM model was consistent with the field conditions for the low to medium circulating flow rates and overestimates the capacity for the high circulating flow rates. Other findings include the impact of exiting traffic, circulating flow rates, degree of saturation, and amount of the gap acceptance data on the calibration results.

Key concepts: Headway, Highway Capacity Manual, Roundabout, Calibration, Transport engineering, Traffic flow (computer networking), Degree of saturation, Traffic simulation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Calibration and Validation of Highway Capacity Manual 2010 Capacity Model for Single-Lane Roundabouts — Research Paper | ScholarLens