1994Unpublished venueRequires access

Safety effects of road design standards

H G Ruyters, M Slop, Fcm Wegman

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

This report describes the results of a study carried out for the European Union. The report uses the safety principle that: (i) proper road design is crucial to prevent human errors in traffic; and (ii) less human errors will result in less accidents. The study contains the following parts: (1) gathering information about existing knowledge on the design of road infrastructure elements by: (a) drawing an inventory of international treaties and recommendations, with information about their legal status; and (b) drawing an inventory of national road design standards and the underlying knowledge; (2) analysing the role road safety arguments have played, when road design standards were compiled; and (3) drawing a 'best practice' for road design standards. Detailed studies were only carried out into: (i) cross-sections including medians, shoulders and verges; (ii) motorway exits and entries; (iii) curves in two-lane roads; and (iv) bicycle facilities at intersections. Preliminary considerations are given, for instance, to: the status of the standards, assumptions underlying the standards, and road classification. The study also summarizes the research methods to be used, when quantifying the relationship between road design standards, accidents and road user behaviour. The study reveals that existing national standards in Europe hardly contain information on the safety effects of the required road designs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report describes the results of a study carried out for the European Union. The report uses the safety principle that: (i) proper road design is crucial to prevent human errors in traffic; and (ii) less human errors will result in less accidents. The study contains the following parts: (1) gathering information about existing knowledge on the design of road infrastructure elements by: (a) drawing an inventory of international treaties and recommendations, with information about their legal status; and (b) drawing an inventory of national road design standards and the underlying knowledge; (2) analysing the role road safety arguments have played, when road design standards were compiled; and (3) drawing a 'best practice' for road design standards. Detailed studies were only carried out into: (i) cross-sections including medians, shoulders and verges; (ii) motorway exits and entries; (iii) curves in two-lane roads; and (iv) bicycle facilities at intersections. Preliminary considerations are given, for instance, to: the status of the standards, assumptions underlying the standards, and road classification. The study also summarizes the research methods to be used, when quantifying the relationship between road design standards, accidents and road user behaviour. The study reveals that existing national standards in Europe hardly contain information on the safety effects of the required road designs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report describes the results of a study carried out for the European Union. The report uses the safety principle that: (i) proper road design is crucial to prevent human errors in traffic; and (ii) less human errors will result in less accidents. The study contains the following parts: (1) gathering information about existing knowledge on the design of road infrastructure elements by: (a) drawing an inventory of international treaties and recommendations, with information about their legal status; and (b) drawing an inventory of national road design standards and the underlying knowledge; (2) analysing the role road safety arguments have played, when road design standards were compiled; and (3) drawing a 'best practice' for road design standards. Detailed studies were only carried out into: (i) cross-sections including medians, shoulders and verges; (ii) motorway exits and entries; (iii) curves in two-lane roads; and (iv) bicycle facilities at intersections. Preliminary considerations are given, for instance, to: the status of the standards, assumptions underlying the standards, and road classification. The study also summarizes the research methods to be used, when quantifying the relationship between road design standards, accidents and road user behaviour. The study reveals that existing national standards in Europe hardly contain information on the safety effects of the required road designs.

Key concepts: Transport engineering, European union, Road map, Engineering, Business, Geography, Cartography, Economic policy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Safety effects of road design standards — Research Paper | ScholarLens