Medicine, eugenics, and the Supreme Court: from coercive sterilization to reproductive freedom.
Paul A. Lombardo
Abstract
Open-access reader
Paul A. Lombardo
Abstract
Open-access reader
2. See HALLER, supra note 1, at 142 (stating that 30 state eugenic sterilization laws (1912) (exhorting medical educators to include instructions in eugenics as a formal part of the medical curriculum).4. See Dr. William Allen, The Relationship of Eugenics to Public Health, 21 EUGENI-CAL NEWS 73-75 (July-Aug.
OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
2. See HALLER, supra note 1, at 142 (stating that 30 state eugenic sterilization laws (1912) (exhorting medical educators to include instructions in eugenics as a formal part of the medical curriculum).4. See Dr. William Allen, The Relationship of Eugenics to Public Health, 21 EUGENI-CAL NEWS 73-75 (July-Aug.
Key concepts: Eugenics, Supreme court, Law, Statute, Legislation, Sterilization (economics), Sociology, Political science