1986OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Boiler design criteria for dry sorbent SO/sub 2/ control with low-NOx burners: new unit applications. Final report, October 1985-March 1986

John P. Clark, A.F. Kwasnik

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This report describes a study to define boiler modifications required to achieve 70% SO/sub 2/ removal with sorbent injection on a large tangentially fired utility boiler without supplemental spray drying. The study is a follow on to a recently completed broader evaluation of boiler-design criteria for sorbent SO/sub 2/ control technology. A new 500-MWe utility boiler burning low-sulfur coal was considered to be modified to increase sorbent residence time and decrease gas quench rate to achieve 70% SO/sub 2/ removal in the boiler with atmospheric calcium hydrate prepared on-site. A second case was considered where no change was made to gas quench rate or sorbent residence time. The effects of adding a pulverizer to the sorbent preparation/injection system to produce a finer sorbent were determined. Capital costs, cost of electricity, and cost effectiveness per ton of SO/sub 2/ removed were developed and compared with the results of the earlier study.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report describes a study to define boiler modifications required to achieve 70% SO/sub 2/ removal with sorbent injection on a large tangentially fired utility boiler without supplemental spray drying. The study is a follow on to a recently completed broader evaluation of boiler-design criteria for sorbent SO/sub 2/ control technology. A new 500-MWe utility boiler burning low-sulfur coal was considered to be modified to increase sorbent residence time and decrease gas quench rate to achieve 70% SO/sub 2/ removal in the boiler with atmospheric calcium hydrate prepared on-site. A second case was considered where no change was made to gas quench rate or sorbent residence time. The effects of adding a pulverizer to the sorbent preparation/injection system to produce a finer sorbent were determined. Capital costs, cost of electricity, and cost effectiveness per ton of SO/sub 2/ removed were developed and compared with the results of the earlier study.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report describes a study to define boiler modifications required to achieve 70% SO/sub 2/ removal with sorbent injection on a large tangentially fired utility boiler without supplemental spray drying. The study is a follow on to a recently completed broader evaluation of boiler-design criteria for sorbent SO/sub 2/ control technology. A new 500-MWe utility boiler burning low-sulfur coal was considered to be modified to increase sorbent residence time and decrease gas quench rate to achieve 70% SO/sub 2/ removal in the boiler with atmospheric calcium hydrate prepared on-site. A second case was considered where no change was made to gas quench rate or sorbent residence time. The effects of adding a pulverizer to the sorbent preparation/injection system to produce a finer sorbent were determined. Capital costs, cost of electricity, and cost effectiveness per ton of SO/sub 2/ removed were developed and compared with the results of the earlier study.

Key concepts: Sorbent, Boiler (water heating), Waste management, Pulverizer, Sulfur dioxide, Coal fired, NOx, Coal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Boiler design criteria for dry sorbent SO/sub 2/ control with low-NOx burners: new unit applications. Final report, October 1985-March 1986 — Research Paper | ScholarLens