1993Unpublished venueOpen access

Water quality of the Upper West Branch Susquehanna River and tributary streams between Curwensville and Renovo, Pennsylvania, May and July 1984

Robert A. Hainly, James L. Barker

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The soils and rocks of the Upper West Branch Susquehanna River basin, from its headwaters downstream for 150 miles, are laden with pyritic materials that have the potential to produce acid mine drainage.The effects of mine drainage are severe, particularly in the reach between Curwensville and Renovo where present water quality cannot support viable populations of benthic macroinvertebrates or fish.During base-flow periods in May and July 1984, streamflow and water quality were measured at four sites on the West Branch Susquehanna River and near the mouths of 94 tributaries.Water-quality constituents determined were temperature, specific conductance, pH, acidity, alkalinity, and concentrations of dissolved sulfate and the total and dissolved forms of iron, manganese, aluminum, and zinc.The data collected for the study indicate that the predominant influence on water quality of the tributaries is land use.An area where few or no coal deposits or disturbed area were present was found to have relatively good surface-water quality (median pH was nearly 5.5 units), whereas areas where coal mining was active in the basin, or where large areas of unreclaimed mines were present, were found to have poorest water quality (median pH was generally less than 4.0 units).In general, Moshannon, Sinnemahoning, Clearfleld, and Kettle Creeks were found to be the largest tributary sources of acidity and total-recoverable iron to the river.During the May sampling, Moshannon, Sinnemahoning, and Clearfield Creeks contributed 63 percent of the 365 tons/day of acidity, and Moshannon and Clearfield Creeks contributed 76 percent of the 44.8 tons/day of totalrecoverable iron that were discharged to the river.During the July sampling, Moshannon, Kettle, and Clearfleld Creeks contributed 60 percent of the 131 tons/day of acidity, and Moshannon and Kettle Creeks contributed 51 percent of the 6.5 tons/day of totalrecoverable iron discharged to the river.The West Branch Susquehanna River was found to have pH ranging from 5.4 to 6.5 units and specific conductance ranging from 267 to 310 fiS/cm (microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius) at the most upstream site at Curwensville.The water quality was most degraded at the site at Karthaus (pH 3.9 to 4.1 units, specific conductance 330 to 610fiS/cm).Quality gradually improved downstream to the site at Renovo (pH 3.8 to 4.6 units, specific conductance 200 to 392^8/cm), although the quality did not recover to that found at Curwensville.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The soils and rocks of the Upper West Branch Susquehanna River basin, from its headwaters downstream for 150 miles, are laden with pyritic materials that have the potential to produce acid mine drainage.The effects of mine drainage are severe, particularly in the reach between Curwensville and Renovo where present water quality cannot support viable populations of benthic macroinvertebrates or fish.During base-flow periods in May and July 1984, streamflow and water quality were measured at four sites on the West Branch Susquehanna River and near the mouths of 94 tributaries.Water-quality constituents determined were temperature, specific conductance, pH, acidity, alkalinity, and concentrations of dissolved sulfate and the total and dissolved forms of iron, manganese, aluminum, and zinc.The data collected for the study indicate that the predominant influence on water quality of the tributaries is land use.An area where few or no coal deposits or disturbed area were present was found to have relatively good surface-water quality (median pH was nearly 5.5 units), whereas areas where coal mining was active in the basin, or where large areas of unreclaimed mines were present, were found to have poorest water quality (median pH was generally less than 4.0 units).In general, Moshannon, Sinnemahoning, Clearfleld, and Kettle Creeks were found to be the largest tributary sources of acidity and total-recoverable iron to the river.During the May sampling, Moshannon, Sinnemahoning, and Clearfield Creeks contributed 63 percent of the 365 tons/day of acidity, and Moshannon and Clearfield Creeks contributed 76 percent of the 44.8 tons/day of totalrecoverable iron that were discharged to the river.During the July sampling, Moshannon, Kettle, and Clearfleld Creeks contributed 60 percent of the 131 tons/day of acidity, and Moshannon and Kettle Creeks contributed 51 percent of the 6.5 tons/day of totalrecoverable iron discharged to the river.The West Branch Susquehanna River was found to have pH ranging from 5.4 to 6.5 units and specific conductance ranging from 267 to 310 fiS/cm (microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius) at the most upstream site at Curwensville.The water quality was most degraded at the site at Karthaus (pH 3.9 to 4.1 units, specific conductance 330 to 610fiS/cm).Quality gradually improved downstream to the site at Renovo (pH 3.8 to 4.6 units, specific conductance 200 to 392^8/cm), although the quality did not recover to that found at Curwensville.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The soils and rocks of the Upper West Branch Susquehanna River basin, from its headwaters downstream for 150 miles, are laden with pyritic materials that have the potential to produce acid mine drainage.The effects of mine drainage are severe, particularly in the reach between Curwensville and Renovo where present water quality cannot support viable populations of benthic macroinvertebrates or fish.During base-flow periods in May and July 1984, streamflow and water quality were measured at four sites on the West Branch Susquehanna River and near the mouths of 94 tributaries.Water-quality constituents determined were temperature, specific conductance, pH, acidity, alkalinity, and concentrations of dissolved sulfate and the total and dissolved forms of iron, manganese, aluminum, and zinc.The data collected for the study indicate that the predominant influence on water quality of the tributaries is land use.An area where few or no coal deposits or disturbed area were present was found to have relatively good surface-water quality (median pH was nearly 5.5 units), whereas areas where coal mining was active in the basin, or where large areas of unreclaimed mines were present, were found to have poorest water quality (median pH was generally less than 4.0 units).In general, Moshannon, Sinnemahoning, Clearfleld, and Kettle Creeks were found to be the largest tributary sources of acidity and total-recoverable iron to the river.During the May sampling, Moshannon, Sinnemahoning, and Clearfield Creeks contributed 63 percent of the 365 tons/day of acidity, and Moshannon and Clearfield Creeks contributed 76 percent of the 44.8 tons/day of totalrecoverable iron that were discharged to the river.During the July sampling, Moshannon, Kettle, and Clearfleld Creeks contributed 60 percent of the 131 tons/day of acidity, and Moshannon and Kettle Creeks contributed 51 percent of the 6.5 tons/day of totalrecoverable iron discharged to the river.The West Branch Susquehanna River was found to have pH ranging from 5.4 to 6.5 units and specific conductance ranging from 267 to 310 fiS/cm (microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius) at the most upstream site at Curwensville.The water quality was most degraded at the site at Karthaus (pH 3.9 to 4.1 units, specific conductance 330 to 610fiS/cm).Quality gradually improved downstream to the site at Renovo (pH 3.8 to 4.6 units, specific conductance 200 to 392^8/cm), although the quality did not recover to that found at Curwensville.

Key concepts: Tributary, STREAMS, Water quality, Hydrology (agriculture), Environmental science, Ditch, Drainage basin, Benthic zone

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Water quality of the Upper West Branch Susquehanna River and tributary streams between Curwensville and Renovo, Pennsylvania, May and July 1984 — Research Paper | ScholarLens