2007American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsRequires access

Pricing‐to‐Market: Price Discrimination or Product Differentiation?

Nathalie Lavoie, Qihong Liu

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

We employ a vertical differentiation model to examine the potential bias in pricing‐to‐market results when using export unit values aggregating differentiated products. Our results show that: (i) false evidence of pricing‐to‐market is always found when using unit values, whether the law of one price holds or not; and (ii) the size of the bias increases with the level of product differentiation. Our simulation results support those conceptual findings. Thus, some of the positive pricing‐to‐market results in the literature could be an artifact of the product heterogeneity embodied in unit values rather than evidence of imperfect competition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We employ a vertical differentiation model to examine the potential bias in pricing‐to‐market results when using export unit values aggregating differentiated products. Our results show that: (i) false evidence of pricing‐to‐market is always found when using unit values, whether the law of one price holds or not; and (ii) the size of the bias increases with the level of product differentiation. Our simulation results support those conceptual findings. Thus, some of the positive pricing‐to‐market results in the literature could be an artifact of the product heterogeneity embodied in unit values rather than evidence of imperfect competition.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We employ a vertical differentiation model to examine the potential bias in pricing‐to‐market results when using export unit values aggregating differentiated products. Our results show that: (i) false evidence of pricing‐to‐market is always found when using unit values, whether the law of one price holds or not; and (ii) the size of the bias increases with the level of product differentiation. Our simulation results support those conceptual findings. Thus, some of the positive pricing‐to‐market results in the literature could be an artifact of the product heterogeneity embodied in unit values rather than evidence of imperfect competition.

Key concepts: Product differentiation, Price discrimination, Artifact (error), Imperfect competition, Unit (ring theory), Economics, Product (mathematics), Competition (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pricing‐to‐Market: Price Discrimination or Product Differentiation? — Research Paper | ScholarLens