2009Journal of Korea TradeRequires access

A CGE Analysis of Free Trade Agreements among China, Japan, and Korea

Young Man Yoon, Chi Gong, Taek Dong Yeo

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the economic impacts of possible FTAs among China, Japan, and Korea and then compare the GDP and welfare effects of FTAs. In order to make a CGE analysis, we employ a multi region, multi sector static CGE model with 5 regions, 12 sectors and 5 endowments, assuming that land, unskilled labor and natural resource cannot mobile among the regions and that skilled labor and capital can mobile among them. Considering four possible FTA scenarios (FTA CJK, FTA KC, FTA KJ, and FTA CJ), we examine the economic effects of FTAs and then show which form of FTAs is most beneficial for each country. For the best scenario of FTA policy, Korea would establish an FTA with China; China would like to form a trilateral FTA with Korea and Japan; Japan would not care much about an FTA with Korea, but for the optimal results Japan, like China, would choose to form a trilateral FTA with China and Korea. In addition, we provide the output and trade effects of FTA KC and FTA CJK.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper, we investigate the economic impacts of possible FTAs among China, Japan, and Korea and then compare the GDP and welfare effects of FTAs. In order to make a CGE analysis, we employ a multi region, multi sector static CGE model with 5 regions, 12 sectors and 5 endowments, assuming that land, unskilled labor and natural resource cannot mobile among the regions and that skilled labor and capital can mobile among them. Considering four possible FTA scenarios (FTA CJK, FTA KC, FTA KJ, and FTA CJ), we examine the economic effects of FTAs and then show which form of FTAs is most beneficial for each country. For the best scenario of FTA policy, Korea would establish an FTA with China; China would like to form a trilateral FTA with Korea and Japan; Japan would not care much about an FTA with Korea, but for the optimal results Japan, like China, would choose to form a trilateral FTA with China and Korea. In addition, we provide the output and trade effects of FTA KC and FTA CJK.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper, we investigate the economic impacts of possible FTAs among China, Japan, and Korea and then compare the GDP and welfare effects of FTAs. In order to make a CGE analysis, we employ a multi region, multi sector static CGE model with 5 regions, 12 sectors and 5 endowments, assuming that land, unskilled labor and natural resource cannot mobile among the regions and that skilled labor and capital can mobile among them. Considering four possible FTA scenarios (FTA CJK, FTA KC, FTA KJ, and FTA CJ), we examine the economic effects of FTAs and then show which form of FTAs is most beneficial for each country. For the best scenario of FTA policy, Korea would establish an FTA with China; China would like to form a trilateral FTA with Korea and Japan; Japan would not care much about an FTA with Korea, but for the optimal results Japan, like China, would choose to form a trilateral FTA with China and Korea. In addition, we provide the output and trade effects of FTA KC and FTA CJK.

Key concepts: Computable general equilibrium, China, Economics, Welfare, International trade, Order (exchange), International economics, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A CGE Analysis of Free Trade Agreements among China, Japan, and Korea — Research Paper | ScholarLens