2000Norsk Geologisk TidsskriftRequires access

An isostatic test of the hypothesis of ice-free mountain areas during the last glaciation

Willy Fjeldskaar

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

There has long been a discussion on whether parts of the highest mountains of Norway were totally ice-covered, or if ice-free areas existed during the Late Weichselian glacial maximum. In this study the hypothesis of a very thin ice sheet was tested by modelling the isostatic response, using an Earth model with layered mantle viscosity overlain by an elastic lithosphere. The theoretical pattern of the present rate of uplift and the tilting history for the western coast of Norway based on a thin ice model show significant deviations from the observations, which seems to rule out the thin ice model as a viable option. However, this is based on the assumption that the present Fennoscandian uplift is caused by glacial isostasy alone. If there really existed large ice-free areas in the highest mountains of Norway in the last glacial maximum, the present Fennoscandian uplift must be ascribed to another mechanism in addition to glacial isostasy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There has long been a discussion on whether parts of the highest mountains of Norway were totally ice-covered, or if ice-free areas existed during the Late Weichselian glacial maximum. In this study the hypothesis of a very thin ice sheet was tested by modelling the isostatic response, using an Earth model with layered mantle viscosity overlain by an elastic lithosphere. The theoretical pattern of the present rate of uplift and the tilting history for the western coast of Norway based on a thin ice model show significant deviations from the observations, which seems to rule out the thin ice model as a viable option. However, this is based on the assumption that the present Fennoscandian uplift is caused by glacial isostasy alone. If there really existed large ice-free areas in the highest mountains of Norway in the last glacial maximum, the present Fennoscandian uplift must be ascribed to another mechanism in addition to glacial isostasy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There has long been a discussion on whether parts of the highest mountains of Norway were totally ice-covered, or if ice-free areas existed during the Late Weichselian glacial maximum. In this study the hypothesis of a very thin ice sheet was tested by modelling the isostatic response, using an Earth model with layered mantle viscosity overlain by an elastic lithosphere. The theoretical pattern of the present rate of uplift and the tilting history for the western coast of Norway based on a thin ice model show significant deviations from the observations, which seems to rule out the thin ice model as a viable option. However, this is based on the assumption that the present Fennoscandian uplift is caused by glacial isostasy alone. If there really existed large ice-free areas in the highest mountains of Norway in the last glacial maximum, the present Fennoscandian uplift must be ascribed to another mechanism in addition to glacial isostasy.

Key concepts: Isostasy, Post-glacial rebound, Geology, Glacial period, Ice sheet, Lithosphere, Geomorphology, Tectonic uplift

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An isostatic test of the hypothesis of ice-free mountain areas during the last glaciation — Research Paper | ScholarLens