2007Foot & Ankle InternationalRequires access

Forefoot Amputation with Limb Revascularization: The Effects of Amputation, Timing, and Wound Closure on the Peripheral Vascular Bypass Graft Site

Maxwell W. Steel, James K. DeOrio

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Much has been written about the effects of successful arterial bypass on forefoot surgery for ulceration and gangrene. This study examined the effects of the amputation site and timing on the arterial bypass graft site. METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients who had successful vascular bypass graft surgery and amputation at our institution, between October, 1995 and May, 2002. Thirty-eight procedures in 35 patients fit the criteria and were included in the study. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients had successful vascular bypass graft surgery and forefoot amputation for gangrene or nonhealing ulceration. Three of these patients developed gangrene on the contralateral side and received similar treatment for that side. All of the wounds eventually healed. Healing time, rate of graft infection, and rate of wound dehiscence did not differ noticeably between patients with amputation immediately after arterial bypass and patients with amputation one or more days after arterial bypass. Infection at the bypass site occurred in two patients; their amputation sites were closed primarily. Wound dehiscence developed at the bypass site in one patient whose amputation site was closed by secondary intention. Although not statistically significant, the median healing time in patients treated with primary closure (37 days) was less than that in patients treated with closure by secondary intention (61 days; p = 0.09), and rates of graft infection and wound dehiscence did not differ between these two groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Amputation site wound closure may adversely affect the bypass graft, but results were not statistically significant. Treatment requires a closely coordinated team approach between the vascular surgeon and the orthopedic surgeon.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Much has been written about the effects of successful arterial bypass on forefoot surgery for ulceration and gangrene. This study examined the effects of the amputation site and timing on the arterial bypass graft site. METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients who had successful vascular bypass graft surgery and amputation at our institution, between October, 1995 and May, 2002. Thirty-eight procedures in 35 patients fit the criteria and were included in the study. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients had successful vascular bypass graft surgery and forefoot amputation for gangrene or nonhealing ulceration. Three of these patients developed gangrene on the contralateral side and received similar treatment for that side. All of the wounds eventually healed. Healing time, rate of graft infection, and rate of wound dehiscence did not differ noticeably between patients with amputation immediately after arterial bypass and patients with amputation one or more days after arterial bypass. Infection at the bypass site occurred in two patients; their amputation sites were closed primarily. Wound dehiscence developed at the bypass site in one patient whose amputation site was closed by secondary intention. Although not statistically significant, the median healing time in patients treated with primary closure (37 days) was less than that in patients treated with closure by secondary intention (61 days; p = 0.09), and rates of graft infection and wound dehiscence did not differ between these two groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Amputation site wound closure may adversely affect the bypass graft, but results were not statistically significant. Treatment requires a closely coordinated team approach between the vascular surgeon and the orthopedic surgeon.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Much has been written about the effects of successful arterial bypass on forefoot surgery for ulceration and gangrene. This study examined the effects of the amputation site and timing on the arterial bypass graft site. METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients who had successful vascular bypass graft surgery and amputation at our institution, between October, 1995 and May, 2002. Thirty-eight procedures in 35 patients fit the criteria and were included in the study. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients had successful vascular bypass graft surgery and forefoot amputation for gangrene or nonhealing ulceration. Three of these patients developed gangrene on the contralateral side and received similar treatment for that side. All of the wounds eventually healed. Healing time, rate of graft infection, and rate of wound dehiscence did not differ noticeably between patients with amputation immediately after arterial bypass and patients with amputation one or more days after arterial bypass. Infection at the bypass site occurred in two patients; their amputation sites were closed primarily. Wound dehiscence developed at the bypass site in one patient whose amputation site was closed by secondary intention. Although not statistically significant, the median healing time in patients treated with primary closure (37 days) was less than that in patients treated with closure by secondary intention (61 days; p = 0.09), and rates of graft infection and wound dehiscence did not differ between these two groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Amputation site wound closure may adversely affect the bypass graft, but results were not statistically significant. Treatment requires a closely coordinated team approach between the vascular surgeon and the orthopedic surgeon.

Key concepts: Medicine, Amputation, Gangrene, Surgery, Forefoot, Revascularization, Dehiscence, Wound dehiscence

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Forefoot Amputation with Limb Revascularization: The Effects of Amputation, Timing, and Wound Closure on the Peripheral Vascular Bypass Graft Site — Research Paper | ScholarLens