Implementing the database directive
P.B. Hugenholtz
Abstract
P.B. Hugenholtz
Abstract
On 11 March 1996, almost six years after the first proposal was presented to the Council , the European Database Directive was finally adopted. The Directive has created a unique two-tier protection scheme of electronic and non-electronic databases. Member States are to protect databases by copyright as intellectual creations. More importantly, the Directive provides for a novel sui generis right to prevent unauthorized extraction or reutilization of the contents of a database. Member States were to implement the provisions of the Directive by 1 January 1998. Only a handful states have met this deadline. In many states implementation bills are still pending in national parliaments; in some countries no legislative activities have occurred at all. In the first part of this article (§§ 2-3) the main provisions of the Directive will be critically reviewed. The second part (§ 4) comprises a status report on the implementation of the Directive in the Member States.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
On 11 March 1996, almost six years after the first proposal was presented to the Council , the European Database Directive was finally adopted. The Directive has created a unique two-tier protection scheme of electronic and non-electronic databases. Member States are to protect databases by copyright as intellectual creations. More importantly, the Directive provides for a novel sui generis right to prevent unauthorized extraction or reutilization of the contents of a database. Member States were to implement the provisions of the Directive by 1 January 1998. Only a handful states have met this deadline. In many states implementation bills are still pending in national parliaments; in some countries no legislative activities have occurred at all. In the first part of this article (§§ 2-3) the main provisions of the Directive will be critically reviewed. The second part (§ 4) comprises a status report on the implementation of the Directive in the Member States.
Key concepts: Directive, Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications, Member states, Legislature, Database, Business, Political science, Member state