1998UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam)Open access

Implementing the database directive

P.B. Hugenholtz

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

On 11 March 1996, almost six years after the first proposal was presented to the Council , the European Database Directive was finally adopted. The Directive has created a unique two-tier protection scheme of electronic and non-electronic databases. Member States are to protect databases by copyright as intellectual creations. More importantly, the Directive provides for a novel sui generis right to prevent unauthorized extraction or reutilization of the contents of a database. Member States were to implement the provisions of the Directive by 1 January 1998. Only a handful states have met this deadline. In many states implementation bills are still pending in national parliaments; in some countries no legislative activities have occurred at all. In the first part of this article (§§ 2-3) the main provisions of the Directive will be critically reviewed. The second part (§ 4) comprises a status report on the implementation of the Directive in the Member States.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

On 11 March 1996, almost six years after the first proposal was presented to the Council , the European Database Directive was finally adopted. The Directive has created a unique two-tier protection scheme of electronic and non-electronic databases. Member States are to protect databases by copyright as intellectual creations. More importantly, the Directive provides for a novel sui generis right to prevent unauthorized extraction or reutilization of the contents of a database. Member States were to implement the provisions of the Directive by 1 January 1998. Only a handful states have met this deadline. In many states implementation bills are still pending in national parliaments; in some countries no legislative activities have occurred at all. In the first part of this article (§§ 2-3) the main provisions of the Directive will be critically reviewed. The second part (§ 4) comprises a status report on the implementation of the Directive in the Member States.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

On 11 March 1996, almost six years after the first proposal was presented to the Council , the European Database Directive was finally adopted. The Directive has created a unique two-tier protection scheme of electronic and non-electronic databases. Member States are to protect databases by copyright as intellectual creations. More importantly, the Directive provides for a novel sui generis right to prevent unauthorized extraction or reutilization of the contents of a database. Member States were to implement the provisions of the Directive by 1 January 1998. Only a handful states have met this deadline. In many states implementation bills are still pending in national parliaments; in some countries no legislative activities have occurred at all. In the first part of this article (§§ 2-3) the main provisions of the Directive will be critically reviewed. The second part (§ 4) comprises a status report on the implementation of the Directive in the Member States.

Key concepts: Directive, Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications, Member states, Legislature, Database, Business, Political science, Member state

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Implementing the database directive — Research Paper | ScholarLens